Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1361-1376.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0393
• Cultivation·Physiology & Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Peng1,2, DING Jie1,3, LIU Chunyan1, LI Hongying1, LI Xinyu1, LIU Yaowen1, QIN Wen1,*()
Received:
2024-01-03
Revised:
2024-03-08
Online:
2024-12-18
Published:
2024-06-22
Contact:
QIN Wen
HUANG Peng, DING Jie, LIU Chunyan, LI Hongying, LI Xinyu, LIU Yaowen, QIN Wen. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Edible Coating on Postharvest Quality of Blueberry[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(6): 1361-1376.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0393
项目 Project | 权重 Weight | 评分标准 Standard of evaluation | 分值 Score |
---|---|---|---|
风味 Flavor | 0.30 | 风味极佳,糖酸均衡,香气浓郁 Excellent flavor,well balanced sugar-acid ratio,with intense aromas | 7 ~ 9 |
糖酸均衡,香气正常 Balanced sugar-acid ratio,normal aroma | 5 ~ 7 | ||
味一般,糖酸不协调,香气弱 Flavor is fair,sugar-acid ratio isn’t harmonious,and aroma is weak | 3 ~ 5 | ||
糖酸不协调,有酸味 Sugar-acid ratio isn’t coordinated,and have sour taste | 1 ~ 3 | ||
风味差,几乎不能食用 Poor flavor and almost inedible | < 1 | ||
口感 Taste | 0.30 | 咀嚼性好,多汁 Chewy well and juicy | 7 ~ 9 |
咀嚼性适中 Chewiness moderate | 5 ~ 7 | ||
咀嚼性差,果汁少 Poor chewability and less juice | 3 ~ 5 | ||
咀嚼性差,几乎不能食用 Poor chewable and almost inedible | < 3 | ||
组织状态 Organization | 0.20 | 弹性好,硬度适中 Good elasticity and moderate hardness | 7 ~ 9 |
弹性一般,稍有软化 Elasticity general,a little softening | 5 ~ 7 | ||
弹性差,易开裂,软化 Poor elasticity,easy crack,softening | 3 ~ 5 | ||
开裂,几乎不能食用 Cracked and almost inedible | < 3 | ||
果粉和色泽 Fruit powder and color | 0.20 | 果粉完整,亮白色 Fruit powder complete,bright white | 7 ~ 9 |
果粉一般,颜色较深 Fruit powder general,dark color | 5 ~ 7 | ||
果粉少,紫红色 Fruit powder less,purplish red | 3 ~ 5 | ||
无果粉,红色 No fruit powder,red | < 3 |
Table 1 Standard of sensory evaluation
项目 Project | 权重 Weight | 评分标准 Standard of evaluation | 分值 Score |
---|---|---|---|
风味 Flavor | 0.30 | 风味极佳,糖酸均衡,香气浓郁 Excellent flavor,well balanced sugar-acid ratio,with intense aromas | 7 ~ 9 |
糖酸均衡,香气正常 Balanced sugar-acid ratio,normal aroma | 5 ~ 7 | ||
味一般,糖酸不协调,香气弱 Flavor is fair,sugar-acid ratio isn’t harmonious,and aroma is weak | 3 ~ 5 | ||
糖酸不协调,有酸味 Sugar-acid ratio isn’t coordinated,and have sour taste | 1 ~ 3 | ||
风味差,几乎不能食用 Poor flavor and almost inedible | < 1 | ||
口感 Taste | 0.30 | 咀嚼性好,多汁 Chewy well and juicy | 7 ~ 9 |
咀嚼性适中 Chewiness moderate | 5 ~ 7 | ||
咀嚼性差,果汁少 Poor chewability and less juice | 3 ~ 5 | ||
咀嚼性差,几乎不能食用 Poor chewable and almost inedible | < 3 | ||
组织状态 Organization | 0.20 | 弹性好,硬度适中 Good elasticity and moderate hardness | 7 ~ 9 |
弹性一般,稍有软化 Elasticity general,a little softening | 5 ~ 7 | ||
弹性差,易开裂,软化 Poor elasticity,easy crack,softening | 3 ~ 5 | ||
开裂,几乎不能食用 Cracked and almost inedible | < 3 | ||
果粉和色泽 Fruit powder and color | 0.20 | 果粉完整,亮白色 Fruit powder complete,bright white | 7 ~ 9 |
果粉一般,颜色较深 Fruit powder general,dark color | 5 ~ 7 | ||
果粉少,紫红色 Fruit powder less,purplish red | 3 ~ 5 | ||
无果粉,红色 No fruit powder,red | < 3 |
Fig. 1 Effect of KL and TKL coating on the appearance and quality of blueberry during storage T:Thymol microcapsules;K:Konjac glucomannan;L:Low acyl gellan gum. Duncan’s method was used for the analysis of significance of among-sample differences. Different lowercase letters indicate that among treatments is significantly different at the 0.05 level. The same below.
时间/d Time | 处理 Treatment | L* | a* | b* | C* | H° |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | KL | 24.47 ± 0.46 a | 2.39 ± 0.31 a | 4.00 ± 0.06 a | 4.17 ± 0.14 a | 64.23 ± 0.97 a |
TKL | 24.47 ± 0.46 a | 2.39 ± 0.31 a | 4.00 ± 0.06 a | 4.17 ± 0.07 a | 64.23 ± 0.97 a | |
对照Control | 24.47 ± 0.46 a | 2.39 ± 0.31 a | 4.00 ± 0.06 a | 4.17 ± 0.14 a | 64.23 ± 0.97 a | |
7 | KL | 22.60 ± 0.39 a | 1.94 ± 0.31 b | 3.27 ± 0.42 a | 4.66 ± 0.44 a | 47.53 ± 0.88 ab |
TKL | 22.74 ± 0.39 a | 3.34 ± 0.24 a | 3.22 ± 0.03 a | 4.36 ± 0.22 a | 51.27 ± 0.52 a | |
对照Control | 19.53 ± 0.29 b | 4.29 ± 0.19 a | 3.33 ± 0.19 a | 5.39 ± 0.15 a | 43.61 ± 0.11 b | |
14 | KL | 22.25 ± 0.81 a | 4.43 ± 0.02 b | 1.59 ± 0.10 b | 3.08 ± 0.39 b | 39.62 ± 1.49 b |
TKL | 21.64 ± 0.53 a | 2.17 ± 0.32 c | 2.46 ± 0.08 a | 3.24 ± 0.30 b | 45.04 ± 1.29 a | |
对照Control | 15.98 ± 0.66 b | 8.29 ± 0.17 a | 1.65 ± 0.10 b | 7.59 ± 0.44 a | 16.23 ± 0.77 c | |
21 | KL | 19.78 ± 0.79 a | 6.27 ± 0.27 b | 1.68 ± 0.13 a | 4.91 ± 0.23 b | 25.72 ± 2.45 b |
TKL | 19.77 ± 0.12 a | 5.61 ± 0.54 b | 1.54 ± 0.09 ab | 4.43 ± 0.64 b | 32.03 ± 1.95 a | |
对照Control | 15.93 ± 0.71 b | 12.23 ± 1.14 a | 1.12 ± 0.11 b | 8.88 ± 0.30 a | 9.73 ± 0.83 c | |
28 | KL | 20.35 ± 0.30 b | 6.43 ± 0.08 b | 1.84 ± 0.20 a | 3.05 ± 0.16 c | 36.74 ± 0.39 a |
TKL | 21.78 ± 0.16 a | 6.22 ± 0.65 b | 1.75 ± 0.19 ab | 4.51 ± 0.23 b | 24.74 ± 0.29 b | |
对照Control | 19.23 ± 0.27 b | 10.69 ± 0.48 a | 1.32 ± 0.08 b | 6.25 ± 0.84 a | 11.09 ± 0.62 c | |
35 | KL | 16.40 ± 0.49 a | 7.33 ± 0.25 b | 1.45 ± 0.06 a | 7.65 ± 0.41 b | 11.27 ± 0.40 a |
TKL | 16.33 ± 0.60 a | 7.78 ± 0.34 b | 1.03 ± 0.09 a | 7.21 ± 0.07 b | 10.96 ± 0.81 a | |
对照Control | 12.01 ± 0.51 b | 12.50 ± 0.53 a | 0.24 ± 0.13 b | 10.72 ± 0.72 a | 0.22 ± 0.86 b | |
42 | KL | 15.10 ± 0.32 a | 9.48 ± 0.36 b | 2.71 ± 0.09 a | 9.34 ± 0.38 b | 16.16 ± 0.19 b |
TKL | 15.70 ± 0.26 a | 8.26 ± 0.50 c | 2.18 ± 0.37 b | 8.40 ± 0.07 b | 22.19 ± 0.73 a | |
对照Control | 11.04 ± 0.18 b | 12.97 ± 0.19 a | 1.44 ± 0.28 c | 12.98 ± 0.07 a | 9.78 ± 0.40 c |
Table 2 Effect of coating on the chrominance of blueberry during storage
时间/d Time | 处理 Treatment | L* | a* | b* | C* | H° |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | KL | 24.47 ± 0.46 a | 2.39 ± 0.31 a | 4.00 ± 0.06 a | 4.17 ± 0.14 a | 64.23 ± 0.97 a |
TKL | 24.47 ± 0.46 a | 2.39 ± 0.31 a | 4.00 ± 0.06 a | 4.17 ± 0.07 a | 64.23 ± 0.97 a | |
对照Control | 24.47 ± 0.46 a | 2.39 ± 0.31 a | 4.00 ± 0.06 a | 4.17 ± 0.14 a | 64.23 ± 0.97 a | |
7 | KL | 22.60 ± 0.39 a | 1.94 ± 0.31 b | 3.27 ± 0.42 a | 4.66 ± 0.44 a | 47.53 ± 0.88 ab |
TKL | 22.74 ± 0.39 a | 3.34 ± 0.24 a | 3.22 ± 0.03 a | 4.36 ± 0.22 a | 51.27 ± 0.52 a | |
对照Control | 19.53 ± 0.29 b | 4.29 ± 0.19 a | 3.33 ± 0.19 a | 5.39 ± 0.15 a | 43.61 ± 0.11 b | |
14 | KL | 22.25 ± 0.81 a | 4.43 ± 0.02 b | 1.59 ± 0.10 b | 3.08 ± 0.39 b | 39.62 ± 1.49 b |
TKL | 21.64 ± 0.53 a | 2.17 ± 0.32 c | 2.46 ± 0.08 a | 3.24 ± 0.30 b | 45.04 ± 1.29 a | |
对照Control | 15.98 ± 0.66 b | 8.29 ± 0.17 a | 1.65 ± 0.10 b | 7.59 ± 0.44 a | 16.23 ± 0.77 c | |
21 | KL | 19.78 ± 0.79 a | 6.27 ± 0.27 b | 1.68 ± 0.13 a | 4.91 ± 0.23 b | 25.72 ± 2.45 b |
TKL | 19.77 ± 0.12 a | 5.61 ± 0.54 b | 1.54 ± 0.09 ab | 4.43 ± 0.64 b | 32.03 ± 1.95 a | |
对照Control | 15.93 ± 0.71 b | 12.23 ± 1.14 a | 1.12 ± 0.11 b | 8.88 ± 0.30 a | 9.73 ± 0.83 c | |
28 | KL | 20.35 ± 0.30 b | 6.43 ± 0.08 b | 1.84 ± 0.20 a | 3.05 ± 0.16 c | 36.74 ± 0.39 a |
TKL | 21.78 ± 0.16 a | 6.22 ± 0.65 b | 1.75 ± 0.19 ab | 4.51 ± 0.23 b | 24.74 ± 0.29 b | |
对照Control | 19.23 ± 0.27 b | 10.69 ± 0.48 a | 1.32 ± 0.08 b | 6.25 ± 0.84 a | 11.09 ± 0.62 c | |
35 | KL | 16.40 ± 0.49 a | 7.33 ± 0.25 b | 1.45 ± 0.06 a | 7.65 ± 0.41 b | 11.27 ± 0.40 a |
TKL | 16.33 ± 0.60 a | 7.78 ± 0.34 b | 1.03 ± 0.09 a | 7.21 ± 0.07 b | 10.96 ± 0.81 a | |
对照Control | 12.01 ± 0.51 b | 12.50 ± 0.53 a | 0.24 ± 0.13 b | 10.72 ± 0.72 a | 0.22 ± 0.86 b | |
42 | KL | 15.10 ± 0.32 a | 9.48 ± 0.36 b | 2.71 ± 0.09 a | 9.34 ± 0.38 b | 16.16 ± 0.19 b |
TKL | 15.70 ± 0.26 a | 8.26 ± 0.50 c | 2.18 ± 0.37 b | 8.40 ± 0.07 b | 22.19 ± 0.73 a | |
对照Control | 11.04 ± 0.18 b | 12.97 ± 0.19 a | 1.44 ± 0.28 c | 12.98 ± 0.07 a | 9.78 ± 0.40 c |
品质指标 Quality indices | 熵值 Entropy value | 差异系数 Variance factor | 权重 Weighting | 修正权重 Correction weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
总酚 Total phenols | 0.6352 | 0.3648 | 0.0728 | 0.0896 |
总黄酮 Total flavonoids | 0.6389 | 0.3611 | 0.0721 | 0.1052 |
可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 0.6337 | 0.3663 | 0.0731 | 0.0499 |
质量损失率 Weight loss rate | 0.6233 | 0.3767 | 0.0752 | 0.0472 |
总糖 Total sugar | 0.6295 | 0.3705 | 0.0740 | 0.1381 |
还原糖 Reducing sugar | 0.6297 | 0.3703 | 0.0739 | 0.1145 |
腐烂率 Decay index | 0.6641 | 0.3359 | 0.0671 | 0.0641 |
L* | 0.6523 | 0.3477 | 0.0694 | 0.0545 |
a* | 0.6469 | 0.3531 | 0.0705 | 0.0659 |
b* | 0.6505 | 0.3495 | 0.0698 | 0.0637 |
硬度 Hardness | 0.6549 | 0.3451 | 0.0689 | 0.0450 |
咀嚼性 Chewiness | 0.6334 | 0.3666 | 0.0732 | 0.0481 |
果形指数 Fruit shape index | 0.6452 | 0.3548 | 0.0708 | 0.0509 |
丙二醛 MDA | 0.6528 | 0.3472 | 0.0693 | 0.0634 |
Table 3 EWM the effect of coating treatment on the weight of quality indicators during storage of blueberry
品质指标 Quality indices | 熵值 Entropy value | 差异系数 Variance factor | 权重 Weighting | 修正权重 Correction weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
总酚 Total phenols | 0.6352 | 0.3648 | 0.0728 | 0.0896 |
总黄酮 Total flavonoids | 0.6389 | 0.3611 | 0.0721 | 0.1052 |
可滴定酸 Titratable acid | 0.6337 | 0.3663 | 0.0731 | 0.0499 |
质量损失率 Weight loss rate | 0.6233 | 0.3767 | 0.0752 | 0.0472 |
总糖 Total sugar | 0.6295 | 0.3705 | 0.0740 | 0.1381 |
还原糖 Reducing sugar | 0.6297 | 0.3703 | 0.0739 | 0.1145 |
腐烂率 Decay index | 0.6641 | 0.3359 | 0.0671 | 0.0641 |
L* | 0.6523 | 0.3477 | 0.0694 | 0.0545 |
a* | 0.6469 | 0.3531 | 0.0705 | 0.0659 |
b* | 0.6505 | 0.3495 | 0.0698 | 0.0637 |
硬度 Hardness | 0.6549 | 0.3451 | 0.0689 | 0.0450 |
咀嚼性 Chewiness | 0.6334 | 0.3666 | 0.0732 | 0.0481 |
果形指数 Fruit shape index | 0.6452 | 0.3548 | 0.0708 | 0.0509 |
丙二醛 MDA | 0.6528 | 0.3472 | 0.0693 | 0.0634 |
Fig. 5 Comprehensive analysis of the effect of coating treatments on the storage quality of blueberry The scores for the EWM and Entropy-TOPSIS methods were expanded 100 times for easy discrimination. The same below.
处理 Treatment | S+ | S- | Ki | 排序 Sort | 处理 Treatment | S+ | S- | Ki | 排序 Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TKL(0) | 0.319 | 0.291 | 0.477 | 1 | KL(21) | 0.309 | 0.185 | 0.374 | 10 |
KL(0) | 0.319 | 0.291 | 0.477 | 1 | TKL(28) | 0.312 | 0.181 | 0.368 | 11 |
对照Control(0) | 0.319 | 0.291 | 0.477 | 1 | KL(42) | 0.324 | 0.163 | 0.335 | 12 |
TKL(7) | 0.307 | 0.268 | 0.466 | 2 | TKL(35) | 0.325 | 0.159 | 0.328 | 13 |
对照Control(14) | 0.316 | 0.254 | 0.446 | 3 | KL(35) | 0.321 | 0.156 | 0.327 | 14 |
KL(7) | 0.318 | 0.243 | 0.433 | 4 | KL(28) | 0.329 | 0.156 | 0.322 | 15 |
对照Control(7) | 0.288 | 0.212 | 0.424 | 5 | 对照Control(35) | 0.331 | 0.152 | 0.314 | 16 |
KL(14) | 0.303 | 0.218 | 0.419 | 6 | TKL(42) | 0.354 | 0.154 | 0.303 | 17 |
TKL(14) | 0.302 | 0.215 | 0.416 | 7 | 对照Control(42) | 0.363 | 0.156 | 0.300 | 18 |
TKL(21) | 0.305 | 0.191 | 0.385 | 8 | 对照Control(28) | 0.340 | 0.137 | 0.288 | 19 |
对照Control(21) | 0.304 | 0.184 | 0.377 | 9 |
Table 4 Entropy-TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation of‘Bluegold’blueberry score ranking
处理 Treatment | S+ | S- | Ki | 排序 Sort | 处理 Treatment | S+ | S- | Ki | 排序 Sort |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TKL(0) | 0.319 | 0.291 | 0.477 | 1 | KL(21) | 0.309 | 0.185 | 0.374 | 10 |
KL(0) | 0.319 | 0.291 | 0.477 | 1 | TKL(28) | 0.312 | 0.181 | 0.368 | 11 |
对照Control(0) | 0.319 | 0.291 | 0.477 | 1 | KL(42) | 0.324 | 0.163 | 0.335 | 12 |
TKL(7) | 0.307 | 0.268 | 0.466 | 2 | TKL(35) | 0.325 | 0.159 | 0.328 | 13 |
对照Control(14) | 0.316 | 0.254 | 0.446 | 3 | KL(35) | 0.321 | 0.156 | 0.327 | 14 |
KL(7) | 0.318 | 0.243 | 0.433 | 4 | KL(28) | 0.329 | 0.156 | 0.322 | 15 |
对照Control(7) | 0.288 | 0.212 | 0.424 | 5 | 对照Control(35) | 0.331 | 0.152 | 0.314 | 16 |
KL(14) | 0.303 | 0.218 | 0.419 | 6 | TKL(42) | 0.354 | 0.154 | 0.303 | 17 |
TKL(14) | 0.302 | 0.215 | 0.416 | 7 | 对照Control(42) | 0.363 | 0.156 | 0.300 | 18 |
TKL(21) | 0.305 | 0.191 | 0.385 | 8 | 对照Control(28) | 0.340 | 0.137 | 0.288 | 19 |
对照Control(21) | 0.304 | 0.184 | 0.377 | 9 |
Fig. 7 Cluster analysis of blueberry quality A:Different indicators;B:Different treatments at different storage times(CK:Control. The number represents the storage days).
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.10.011 |
陈志敏, 陈晓林, 谭振华, 陈兆星, 谌丹丹, 马岩岩, 郑永强, 易时来, 吕强, 谢让金. 2023. 不同产区纽荷尔脐橙橘园果实综合品质评价与适宜区域筛选. 中国农业科学, 56 (10):1949-1965.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.10.011 |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0748 |
丁捷, 刘春燕, 黄彭, 李红莹, 陈黎维, 蒲小燕, 刘耀文, 秦文. 2023. 蓝莓保鲜技术研究进展. 园艺学报, 50 (9):1944-1958.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0748 |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
Kumar,Saini C S. 2021. Edible composite bi-layer coating based on whey protein isolate,xanthan gum and clove oil for prolonging shelf life of tomatoes. Measurement:Food,(2):100001-100005.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
王玉霞, 武晓玉, 夏鹏飞, 段文达, 王玉, 赵磊. 2021. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型对经不同方法干燥的苦水玫瑰品质的综合评价. 中成药, 43 (5):1241-1248.
|
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
杨柳, 黎曼缇, 易自力, 朱洺志, 黄红梅. 2023. 21份金柑种质的果实品质分析与综合评价. 中国果树,(5):56-62,69.
|
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[1] | LI Yachen, ZHENG Yanmei, SONG Wenpei, LI Dawei, LIANG Hong, and ZHANG Xianzhi, . Research Progress on the Role of Hydrogen-Rich Water in Plant Growth and Development and Stress Response [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(7): 1489-1500. |
[2] | SUN Quan, HE Zhengchen, YE Junli, WEI Ranran, YIN Yingzi, CHAI Lijun, XIE Zongzhou, XU Qiang, XU Juan, GUO Wenwu, CHENG Yunjiang, DENG Xiuxin. Storage with Climacteric Fruits Improves Color and Quality of Citrus Fruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(3): 601-615. |
[3] | HE Bin, XU Qinchao, JI Xiaomei, WANG Xiaoling, ZHANG Wendong, CHENG Yunjiang, ZENG Yunliu. Progress of Application on Controlled Atmosphere Preservation Technology in Kiwifruit Storage and Preservation [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(9): 1916-1928. |
[4] | DING Jie, LIU Chunyan, HUANG Peng, LI Hongying, CHEN Liwei, PU Xiaoyan, LIU Yaowen, QIN Wen. Recent Advances in Postharvest Technologies to Extend the Shelf Life of Blueberries [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(9): 1944-1958. |
[5] | WANG Hongxiu, ZHOU Shangling, HE Shaoguo, TIAN Zaize, MA Jinghua, PENG Liangzhi, CHUN Changpin. Study on the Standard of Nutrient Elements Contents in Eureka Lemon Leaves [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1535-1546. |
[6] | DENG Chengfeng, LI Suping, ZHANG Ruixuan, HAN Leng, LI Yong. Control Effect of Lysobacter enzymogenes LE16 on Rot Disease in Post-harvest Citrus Fruit Caused by Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1574-1586. |
[7] | ZHOU Cheng, FANG Yi, ZHOU Jinyang, HUANG Qihao, PAN Yongjian, SHI Qianqian, NI Huixian, YANG Zhenfeng, SONG Chunbo. The Relationship Between Membrane Lipid Metabolism and Chilling Injury of Postharvest Peach Fruit Induced by Low Temperature [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1305-1317. |
[8] | LI Ke, SHEN Mengxiao, PAN Weihao, ZHANG Shixuan, MAO Xinye, YIN Yahong, LI Yongqiang, ZHU Youyin, GUO Weidong. Preliminary Investigation of C2H2 Family Genes in Blueberry Flower Bud Dormancy Release [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(4): 737-753. |
[9] | ZOU Yunqian, LUO Qujuan, ZHANG Jin, XU Rangwei, CHENG Yunjiang. Coating Containing Shellac,Rosin Significantly Improves Commercial Value of Satsuma Mandarins and Lane Late Navel Orange During Shelf Life [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(4): 853-863. |
[10] | DUAN Ruiwei, ZHANG Xiangzhan, LI Bo, WANG Mengru, XIE Yarong, LI Pei, WANG Lei, YANG Jian, XUE Huabai. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Spots in 296 Pear Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(11): 2305-2322. |
[11] | HE Yafang, BAO Huifang, WANG Ning, ZHAN Faqiang, ZHANG Xuejun, SHI Yingwu, YANG Rong, HOU Xinqiang, LONG Xuanqi. Screening of Antagonistic Bacteria Against Fusarium spp. Causing Melon Fruit Rot and the Antagonistic Properties [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(10): 2257-2270. |
[12] | YUAN Xin, XU Yunhe, ZHANG Yupei, SHAN Nan, CHEN Chuying, WAN Chunpeng, KAI Wenbin, ZHAI Xiawan, CHEN Jinyin, GAN Zengyu. Studies on AcAREB1 Regulating the Expression of AcGH3.1 During Postharvest Ripening of Kiwifruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 53-64. |
[13] | DU Yuling, YANG Fan, ZHAO Juan, LIU Shuqi, LONG Chaoan. Antifungal Mechanisms of Sodium New Houttuyfonate Against Penicillium digitatum [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(1): 145-152. |
[14] | A New Rabbiteye Blueberry Cultivar‘Languan’. A New Rabbiteye Blueberry Cultivar‘Languan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 43-44. |
[15] | XUE Weiwen, ZHOU Xianfang, ZHANG Zhaoqi, FANG Fang. Advances in Lignin Accumulation and Its Regulation on the Quality of Postharvest Fruit and Vegetables [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(9): 2023-2036. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd