Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 162-174.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0265
• Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Suping1, LI Wei1, HAN Leng2, HUANG Jianguo1,*()
Received:
2023-04-20
Revised:
2023-08-13
Online:
2024-01-25
Published:
2024-01-16
Contact:
(E-mail:LI Suping, LI Wei, HAN Leng, HUANG Jianguo. Bacillus velezensis HY19 Volatile Organic Compounds as a Preservative in Postharvest Citrus Fruit Management[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(1): 162-174.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.ahs.ac.cn/EN/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2023-0265
Fig. 1 Antagonism of Bacillus velezensis HY19 against Penicillium italicum and P. digitatum in confrontation test Vertical bars represent means ± standard deviation(n = 3).
Fig. 2 Inhibition of Bacillus velezensis HY19 volatile organic compounds(VOCs)against Penicillium italicum and P. digitatum Vertical bars represent means ± standard deviation(n = 3).
化合物 Substances | 分子式 Formula | 相对含量/% Relative content | 化合物 Substances | 分子式 Formula | 相对含量/% Relative content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-壬醇1-Nonanol | C9H2OO | 6.33 ± 0.71 | 2-癸酮2-Decanone | C10H2OO | 2.07 ± 0.32 |
2-壬醇2-Nonanol | C9H2OO | 5.17 ± 0.51 | 二十烷Eicosane | C20H42 | 4.12 ± 0.33 |
1-辛醇1-Octanol | C8H18O | 5.04 ± 0.40 | 十九烷Nonadecane | C20H42 | 2.93 ± 0.14 |
d-薄荷醇d-Menthol | C10H2OO | 3.64 ± 0.73 | 十六烷Hexadecane | C16H34 | 1.08 ± 0.19 |
香叶醇Geraniol | C10H18O | 1.95 ± 0.21 | 甲酯Methyl ester | C10H10O2 | 2.51 ± 0.45 |
正十五醇n-Pentadecanol | C15H32O | 1.78 ± 0.09 | 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯 Dibutyl phthalate | C16H22O4 | 2.31 ± 0.34 |
2-十三酮2-Tridecanone | C13H26O | 9.57 ± 0.73 | 苯甲酸Benzoic acid | C15H22O2 | 3.48 ± 0.78 |
2-壬酮2-Nonanone | C9H18O | 7.77 ± 0.47 | 甲酸Formic acid | C12H24O2 | 2.22 ± 0.19 |
2-十一酮2-Undecanone | C11H22O | 5.11 ± 0.96 | 2,4-二叔丁基苯酚 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | C14H22O | 5.52 ± 0.52 |
Table 1 Relative content of antifungal substances present in Bacillus velezensis HY19 volatile organic compounds
化合物 Substances | 分子式 Formula | 相对含量/% Relative content | 化合物 Substances | 分子式 Formula | 相对含量/% Relative content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-壬醇1-Nonanol | C9H2OO | 6.33 ± 0.71 | 2-癸酮2-Decanone | C10H2OO | 2.07 ± 0.32 |
2-壬醇2-Nonanol | C9H2OO | 5.17 ± 0.51 | 二十烷Eicosane | C20H42 | 4.12 ± 0.33 |
1-辛醇1-Octanol | C8H18O | 5.04 ± 0.40 | 十九烷Nonadecane | C20H42 | 2.93 ± 0.14 |
d-薄荷醇d-Menthol | C10H2OO | 3.64 ± 0.73 | 十六烷Hexadecane | C16H34 | 1.08 ± 0.19 |
香叶醇Geraniol | C10H18O | 1.95 ± 0.21 | 甲酯Methyl ester | C10H10O2 | 2.51 ± 0.45 |
正十五醇n-Pentadecanol | C15H32O | 1.78 ± 0.09 | 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯 Dibutyl phthalate | C16H22O4 | 2.31 ± 0.34 |
2-十三酮2-Tridecanone | C13H26O | 9.57 ± 0.73 | 苯甲酸Benzoic acid | C15H22O2 | 3.48 ± 0.78 |
2-壬酮2-Nonanone | C9H18O | 7.77 ± 0.47 | 甲酸Formic acid | C12H24O2 | 2.22 ± 0.19 |
2-十一酮2-Undecanone | C11H22O | 5.11 ± 0.96 | 2,4-二叔丁基苯酚 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | C14H22O | 5.52 ± 0.52 |
化合物/(μL · 皿-1) Substances | 意大利青霉P. italicum | 指状青霉P. digitatum | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50/(μL · 皿-1) | 95%置信区间Confidence limits | IC50/(μL · 皿-1) | 95%置信区间Confidence limits | |
2-壬醇2-Nonanol | 0.31 | 0.27 ~ 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.29 ~ 0.36 |
2-壬酮2-Nonanone | 14.10 | 12.09 ~ 16.28 | 8.70 | 7.23 ~ 10.19 |
香叶醇Geraniol | 49.14 | 44.88 ~ 53.80 | 47.63 | 44.55 ~ 50.91 |
苯甲酸Benzoic acid | 13.80 | 12.20 ~ 15.59 | 14.45 | 13.49 ~ 15.47 |
Table 2 Inhibition of 2-nonanol,2-nonanone,geraniol,and benzoic acid against Penicillium italicum and P. digitatum
化合物/(μL · 皿-1) Substances | 意大利青霉P. italicum | 指状青霉P. digitatum | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IC50/(μL · 皿-1) | 95%置信区间Confidence limits | IC50/(μL · 皿-1) | 95%置信区间Confidence limits | |
2-壬醇2-Nonanol | 0.31 | 0.27 ~ 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.29 ~ 0.36 |
2-壬酮2-Nonanone | 14.10 | 12.09 ~ 16.28 | 8.70 | 7.23 ~ 10.19 |
香叶醇Geraniol | 49.14 | 44.88 ~ 53.80 | 47.63 | 44.55 ~ 50.91 |
苯甲酸Benzoic acid | 13.80 | 12.20 ~ 15.59 | 14.45 | 13.49 ~ 15.47 |
处理 Treatment | 发病率/% Disease incidence | 防治效果/% Control efficacies | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
青霉病Blue mould | 绿霉病Green mould | 青霉病Blue mould | 绿霉病Green mould | |
对照Control | 61.75 ± 3.86 a | 62.00 ± 5.16 a | 0 | 0 |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 10.75 ± 1.89 c | 8.25 ± 1.26 c | 82.66 ± 2.38 | 86.50 ± 3.18 |
HY19挥发物 Volatile organic compounds | 25.00 ± 4.08 b | 22.25 ± 2.87 b | 59.65 ± 4.46 | 64.11 ± 3.52 |
Table 3 Effects of Bacillus velezensis HY19 volatile compounds on disease incidence in citrus fruit with the artificial inoculation of Penicillium italicum and P. digitatum
处理 Treatment | 发病率/% Disease incidence | 防治效果/% Control efficacies | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
青霉病Blue mould | 绿霉病Green mould | 青霉病Blue mould | 绿霉病Green mould | |
对照Control | 61.75 ± 3.86 a | 62.00 ± 5.16 a | 0 | 0 |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 10.75 ± 1.89 c | 8.25 ± 1.26 c | 82.66 ± 2.38 | 86.50 ± 3.18 |
HY19挥发物 Volatile organic compounds | 25.00 ± 4.08 b | 22.25 ± 2.87 b | 59.65 ± 4.46 | 64.11 ± 3.52 |
Fig. 3 Effects of Bacillus velezensis HY19 volatile organic compounds(VOCs)on autioxidant enzyme(SOD and POD)activities,malondialdehyde(MDA),and membrane permeability in citrus fruit peels with the artificial inoculation of Penicillium italicum and P. digitatum Different small letters in the same bar represent significant differences(P < 0.05,n = 4)among different treatments.
处理 Treatment | 15 d | 30 d | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
腐烂率/% Decay rate | 防腐效果/% Preservative effect | 腐烂率/% Decay rate | 防腐效果/% Preservative effect | |
对照Control | 9.25 ± 1.26 a | 0 | 17.25 ± 1.71 a | 0 |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 1.25 ± 0.50 c | 86.77 ± 3.37 | 3.75 ± 0.96 c | 78.38 ± 4.35 |
HY19挥发物Volatile organic compounds | 4.00 ± 0.82 b | 57.04 ± 3.67 | 7.25 ± 0.96 b | 58.07 ± 1.88 |
Table 4 Preservative effect of Bacillus velezensis HY19 volatile organic compounds on postharvest citrus fruit
处理 Treatment | 15 d | 30 d | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
腐烂率/% Decay rate | 防腐效果/% Preservative effect | 腐烂率/% Decay rate | 防腐效果/% Preservative effect | |
对照Control | 9.25 ± 1.26 a | 0 | 17.25 ± 1.71 a | 0 |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 1.25 ± 0.50 c | 86.77 ± 3.37 | 3.75 ± 0.96 c | 78.38 ± 4.35 |
HY19挥发物Volatile organic compounds | 4.00 ± 0.82 b | 57.04 ± 3.67 | 7.25 ± 0.96 b | 58.07 ± 1.88 |
贮藏时间/ d Storage time | 处理 Treatment | 失重率/% Weight loss | 可溶性固形物/ (g · L-1) Soluble solids | 维生素C/ (g · L-1) Vitamin C | 可滴定酸/% Titratable acid | 硬度/N Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | — | — | 112.88 ± 0.85 a | 0.54 ± 0.02 a | 1.20 ± 0.08 a | 19.82 ± 1.29 a |
15 | 对照Control | 2.93 ± 0.19 b | 114.13 ± 2.72 a | 0.43 ± 0.02 b | 0.97 ± 0.04 b | 16.95 ± 0.95 b |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 2.85 ± 0.36 b | 116.13 ± 2.39 a | 0.45 ± 0.02 b | 0.95 ± 0.03 b | 16.59 ± 1.40 b | |
HY19挥发物Volatile organic compounds | 3.01 ± 0.31 b | 114.50 ± 2.92 a | 0.42 ± 0.02 b | 0.94 ± 0.02 b | 17.13 ± 1.08 b | |
30 | 对照Control | 6.04 ± 0.78 a | 114.00 ± 2.35 a | 0.32 ± 0.01 c | 0.85 ± 0.02 c | 14.98 ± 1.00 c |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 5.81 ± 0.45 a | 114.88 ± 2.95 a | 0.33 ± 0.02 c | 0.85 ± 0.04 c | 14.95 ± 1.65 c | |
HY19挥发物Volatile organic compounds | 5.92 ± 0.77 a | 115.75 ± 3.50 a | 0.33 ± 0.01 c | 0.85 ± 0.04 c | 15.32 ± 1.59 c |
Table 5 Effects of Bacillus velezensis HY19 volatile organic compounds on the quality of postharvest citrus fruit
贮藏时间/ d Storage time | 处理 Treatment | 失重率/% Weight loss | 可溶性固形物/ (g · L-1) Soluble solids | 维生素C/ (g · L-1) Vitamin C | 可滴定酸/% Titratable acid | 硬度/N Hardness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | — | — | 112.88 ± 0.85 a | 0.54 ± 0.02 a | 1.20 ± 0.08 a | 19.82 ± 1.29 a |
15 | 对照Control | 2.93 ± 0.19 b | 114.13 ± 2.72 a | 0.43 ± 0.02 b | 0.97 ± 0.04 b | 16.95 ± 0.95 b |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 2.85 ± 0.36 b | 116.13 ± 2.39 a | 0.45 ± 0.02 b | 0.95 ± 0.03 b | 16.59 ± 1.40 b | |
HY19挥发物Volatile organic compounds | 3.01 ± 0.31 b | 114.50 ± 2.92 a | 0.42 ± 0.02 b | 0.94 ± 0.02 b | 17.13 ± 1.08 b | |
30 | 对照Control | 6.04 ± 0.78 a | 114.00 ± 2.35 a | 0.32 ± 0.01 c | 0.85 ± 0.02 c | 14.98 ± 1.00 c |
咪鲜胺Prochloraz | 5.81 ± 0.45 a | 114.88 ± 2.95 a | 0.33 ± 0.02 c | 0.85 ± 0.04 c | 14.95 ± 1.65 c | |
HY19挥发物Volatile organic compounds | 5.92 ± 0.77 a | 115.75 ± 3.50 a | 0.33 ± 0.01 c | 0.85 ± 0.04 c | 15.32 ± 1.59 c |
[1] |
doi: 10.1186/s13568-017-0351-z URL |
[2] |
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.04.060 URL |
[3] |
doi: S0944-5013(18)30865-6 pmid: 30642464 |
[4] |
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030449 URL |
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.01.006 pmid: 21262282 |
[6] |
doi: 10.3390/ijms221910438 URL |
[7] |
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108957 URL |
[8] |
|
邓成凤, 李素平, 张瑞轩, 韩冷, 李勇. 2023. 产酶溶杆菌LE16对采后柑橘青霉绿霉病的防治作用. 园艺学报, 50 (7):1574-1586.
|
|
[9] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0701 URL |
邓秀新. 2022. 中国柑橘育种60年回顾与展望. 园艺学报, 49 (10):2063-2074.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0701 URL |
|
[10] |
doi: 10.1021/jf5001138 pmid: 24934765 |
[11] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0982 URL |
杜玉玲, 杨凡, 赵娟, 刘书琪, 龙超安. 2023. 新鱼腥草素钠对柑橘指状青霉的抑菌作用. 园艺学报, 50 (1):145-152.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0982 URL |
|
[12] |
pmid: 12744290 |
[13] |
|
方园, 彭勇政, 廖长贵, 陈路生, 周琦, 黄俭, 阎依超, 王慕媛, 张祎坤, 邹丽芳, 陈功友. 2022. 一株具有防病促生功能的贝莱斯芽孢杆菌SF327. 微生物学报, 62 (10):4071-4088.
|
|
[14] |
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2019.04.017 |
冯福山, 刘君昂, 胡廉成, 文瑞芝, 周国英. 2019. 枯草芽胞杆菌Y13挥发性物质的分析及抑菌活性. 中国生物防治学报, 35 (4):597-604.
doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2019.04.017 |
|
[15] |
|
冯吉睿, 周雅涵, 曾凯芳. 2015. 膜醭毕赤酵母结合杀菌剂对柑橘果实采后病害的控制效果. 食品科学, 36 (12):249-254.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201512047 |
|
[16] |
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407677-8.00002-6 pmid: 23419716 |
[17] |
doi: 10.3390/ijms17091421 URL |
[18] |
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87604-1 pmid: 33850230 |
[19] |
|
[20] |
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20220104-022 |
黄伟, 王宁, 刘峰娟, 宋博, 秦新政, 罗义, 鲁志远, 马昊翔, 张丽娟, 王玮. 2022. 产香真菌M6-5的鉴定及其挥发性物质对库尔勒香梨果实采后黑斑病的抑制效果. 食品科学, 43 (22):199-206.
|
|
[21] |
doi: 10.1111/jfds.1979.44.issue-1 URL |
黄文源, 张盈, 魏进, 龙家寰, 张昌朋, 李明, 段婷婷. 2023. 啶虫脒和吡丙醚在柑橘上的残留行为及膳食风险评估. 食品科学, 44 (14):1-12.
|
|
[22] |
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.935675 URL |
[23] |
doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.06.003 URL |
[24] |
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105199 URL |
[25] |
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201809033 |
刘晓佳, 薛耀碧, 周雅涵, 姚世响, 邓丽莉, 曾凯芳. 2018. 苯并噻二唑处理对柑橘果实采后病害控制效果及机制分析. 食品科学, 39 (9):215-223.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201809033 |
|
[26] |
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-0600 |
刘洋, 刘晓昆, 陈文浩. 2019. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌(Bacillus velezensis)物种名称的“前世今生”. 生物技术通报, 35 (7):230-232.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2019-0600 |
|
[27] |
doi: S0944-5013(18)31398-3 pmid: 30825939 |
[28] |
doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.11.021 URL |
[29] |
doi: 10.3390/molecules24061046 URL |
[30] |
|
[31] |
doi: 10.1111/jam.12212 pmid: 23560777 |
[32] |
|
[33] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108649 URL |
[34] |
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.10.006 URL |
[35] |
doi: 10.1007/s00253-022-12049-z |
[36] |
doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7584-7 URL |
[37] |
doi: S0740-0020(17)31037-7 pmid: 31027821 |
[38] |
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122511 URL |
[39] |
|
司琳媛. 2015. 葡萄有孢汉逊酵母(Hanseniaspora uvarum)挥发性代谢物对草莓采后贮藏性能的影响[硕士论文]. 南京: 南京农业大学.
|
|
[40] |
doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0200 URL |
[41] |
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115918 URL |
[42] |
doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1829542 URL |
[43] |
doi: 10.1002/mbo3.v8.8 URL |
[44] |
|
夏丽娟, 许中怀, 董雪娟, 万莉. 2023. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌对黄瓜白粉病的毒力与防效及对黄瓜的安全性评价. 中国农学通报, 39 (6):111-115.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0208 |
|
[45] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0143 URL |
徐国亮, 赵飞飞, 王清廉, 王世玲, 贾瑾, 陈艳玲, 黄传宏, 刘永忠, 彭抒昂, 王国平, 洪霓, 丁芳. 2018. 一种新的柑橘采后病害病原的鉴定. 园艺学报, 45 (10):2037-2044.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0143 URL |
|
[46] |
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-20-1666-RE URL |
[47] |
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0476 URL |
闫助冰, 王玫, 明常军, 姜远茂, 沈向, 陈学森, 尹承苗, 毛志泉. 2021. 贝莱斯芽孢杆菌XC1的筛选、鉴定及其对苹果连作障碍的影响. 园艺学报, 48 (3):409-420.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2020-0476 URL |
|
[48] |
|
易婷, 黄纯杨, 李治模, 王勇, 刘东阳, 彭丽媛, 殷洁, 黄建国. 2022. 贝莱斯芽胞杆菌菌株HY19对多种作物病原真菌的拮抗和对烤烟赤星病的防治作用. 植物保护学报, 49 (3):966-974.
|
|
[49] |
|
袁志林, 陈益存, 毛黎娟, 章初龙, 陈连庆. 2013. 3株产气内生真菌的水果防腐活性及其气体成分分析. 林业科学, 49 (6):83-89.
|
|
[50] |
doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11581-8 |
[51] |
doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.112094 URL |
[52] |
doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0841-2 |
[53] |
|
钟涛, 王智荣, 杜木英. 2021. 微生物源挥发性物质防治采后果蔬病害的研究进展. 微生物学报, 61 (7):1771-1785.
|
|
[54] |
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b02315 pmid: 26257042 |
[1] | GUAN Sihui, LIU Chenxu, YAO Zhuping, WAN Hongjian, DIAO Ming, and CHENG Yuan, . Effects of Humic Acid Treatment on the Composition and Content of Volatile Organic Compounds in Cherry Tomato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(2): 346-360. |
[2] | JIN Tian, XU Yuemei, KUANG Guanling, LIU Guidong. Effect of Boron Deficiency on the Root Growth and Mitochondrial Function of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(1): 121-132. |
[3] | CHEN Min, WU Tianli, Lü Yuanda, JIANG Bo, YAN Huaxue, LI Juan, ZHONG Yun. Analysis on Growth,Physiology and Fruit Quality of‘Hongjiang’Orange Grafted with Different Rootstocks Under Container Culture [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1547-1562. |
[4] | DENG Chengfeng, LI Suping, ZHANG Ruixuan, HAN Leng, LI Yong. Control Effect of Lysobacter enzymogenes LE16 on Rot Disease in Post-harvest Citrus Fruit Caused by Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(7): 1574-1586. |
[5] | ZHANG Lehuan, ZOU Changyu, WANG Zhaohao, YANG Wen, ZOU Xiuping, HE Yongrui, CHEN Shanchun, LONG Qin. Cloning and Expression Analysis of CsAOS1-2 in Responding to Citrus Canker Disease [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(6): 1355-1367. |
[6] | GUO Jing, LIAO Manyu, JIN Yan, MA Xiaochuan, ZHANG Fen, LU Xiaopeng, DENG Ziniu, SHENG Ling. Functional Analysis of Transcription Factor CsbHLH3 in Regulating Citric Acid Metabolism of Citrus Fruit [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(5): 947-958. |
[7] | LÜ Ruoya, LI Yun, ZHENG Yongqin, DENG Xiaoling, ZHENG Zheng. The Distribution Pattern of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Fruit Pith [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(5): 1110-1117. |
[8] | WANG Ping, SHENG Ling, YANG Jinpeng, ZHOU Linglei, JIN Yan, LUO Xuzhao, MA Xianfeng, DENG Ziniu. Evaluation of Resistance to Citrus Canker Disease in Hybrid Progeny of Red Pomelo and American Citron [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(4): 765-777. |
[9] | ZOU Yunqian, LUO Qujuan, ZHANG Jin, XU Rangwei, CHENG Yunjiang. Coating Containing Shellac,Rosin Significantly Improves Commercial Value of Satsuma Mandarins and Lane Late Navel Orange During Shelf Life [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(4): 853-863. |
[10] | LAI Hengxin, LI Wenguang, PENG Liangzhi, HE Yizhong, ZHU Panpan, YANG Wanyun, LING Lili, FU Xingzheng, CHUN Changpin, CAO Li. Quality Changes of On-tree Storage Fruit of Orah Mandarin(Citrus reticulata Blanco)During Spring and Summer Seasons [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(3): 485-494. |
[11] | LIU Yunuo, CAO Ya, WANG Shuai, DU Meixia, ZHENG Lin, CHEN Shanchun, ZOU Xiuping. Expression Analysis of CsMYB41 and CsMYB63 Genes in Response to Citrus Canker [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(3): 495-507. |
[12] | YE Zimao, SHEN Wanxia, LIU Mengyu, WANG Tong, ZHANG Xiaonan, YU Xin, LIU Xiaofeng, ZHAO Xiaochun. Effect of R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor CitMYB21 on Flavonoids Biosynthesis in Citrus [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(2): 250-264. |
[13] | LIANG Shengmin, ZHANG Fei, WU Qiangsheng. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Improve Drought Tolerance of Trifoliate Orange Seedlings by Regulating Root Polyamines [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(12): 2680-2688. |
[14] | ZHANG Shaoran, ZONG Qi, LIU Yang, JIANG Ling. In Situ Hybridization Analysis of Distinctive Ribonucleotide Reductase β Subunit Gene from Candidatus Liberibacter Asiaticus of Citrus [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(12): 2689-2700. |
[15] | CHEN Qi, LI Ting, CHEN Jialin, CHEN Ou, WANG Wenjun, YAO Shixiang, ZENG Kaifang. Studies on Function and Mechanism of CsNAC2 Transcription Factor in Resistance to Green Mold in Citrus [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2023, 50(12): 2701-2712. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2012 Acta Horticulturae Sinica 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
Tel: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
Support by: Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd