The Effect of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Potato Photosynthesis,Tuber Formation and Quality

doi:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0436

Acta Horticulturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (7): 1491-1504.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0436

• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles

The Effect of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Potato Photosynthesis,Tuber Formation and Quality

YAN Wenyuan, QIN Junhong, DUAN Shaoguang, XU Jianfei, JIAN Yinqiao, JIN Liping, LI Guangcun()

Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Breeding of Tuber Crops,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Institute of Vegetables and Flowers,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China

Received:2022-03-04 Revised:2022-04-06 Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-07-29

Abstract

Abstract:

A pot experiment was conducted in the rain shelter to investigate the effects of irrigation regimes and nitrogen fertilizer application on the potato and develop the optimal water and nitrogen application pattern. Three irrigation regimes（insufficient irrigation amount,normal irrigation amount,excessive irrigation amount）and three nitrogen applications（insufficient nitrogen application,normal nitrogen application,excessive nitrogen application）were set in the experiment to study the effects of the potato（Zhongshu 18,Zhongshu 28）on plant height,tuber formation,photosynthetic characteristics of leaves,tuber weight and quality. The result proved that the deficient nitrogen treatment can make the subapical stolon swelled,the tuber formation period advanced,but fail to obtain high yield ultimately,in The increase of nitrogen amount made the fresh weight of underground stem,underground root,stem and leaf improved,in the irrigation treatments. The increase of nitrogen amount could raise leaf stomatal conductance,net photosynthetic rate,relative chlorophyll content and plant height,in the treatments of normal and excessive irrigation amount. In the treatment of normal irrigation amount and excessive nitrogen application,the tuber weight per plant of Zhongshu 18 and Zhongshu 28 were 711.1 g and 637.2 g;moreover,the net photosynthetic rate,the yield water use efficiency,the tuber starch and the crude protein content of both were at the highest level among all the treatments. Therefore,it is suggested that the normal irrigation amount and excessive nitrogen application should be adopted for potato growth.

Key words: potato, photosynthesis characteristic, tuber formation, water and nitrogen interaction

CLC Number:

S532

YAN Wenyuan, QIN Junhong, DUAN Shaoguang, XU Jianfei, JIAN Yinqiao, JIN Liping, LI Guangcun. The Effect of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Potato Photosynthesis,Tuber Formation and Quality[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(7): 1491-1504.

Figures/Tables 12

References 38

[1]	Asadi M, Eshghizadeh H R. 2021. Response of sorghum genotypes to water deficit stress under different CO₂and nitrogen levels. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 158:255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.010 URL
[2]	Agrawal L, Chakraborty S, Jaiswal D K. 2008. Comparative proteomics of tuber induction,development and maturation reveal the complexity of tuberization process in potato(Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Proteome Research, 7 (9):3803-3817. doi: 10.1021/pr8000755 pmid: 18672926
[3]	Bohman B J, Rosen C J, Mulla D J. 2020. Impact of variable rate nitrogen and reduced irrigation management on nitrate leaching for potato. Journal of Environmental Quality, 49 (2):281-291. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20028 pmid: 33016433
[4]	Bunce J. 2019. Consistent differences in field leaf water-use efficiency among soybean cultivars. Plants, 8 (5):123. doi: 10.3390/plants8050123 URL
[5]	Chen Y, Li C, Yi J, Yang Y, Lei C, Gong M. 2019. Transcriptome response to drought,rehydration and re-dehydration in potato. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21 (1):159. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010159 URL
[6]	da Ros L, Elferjani R, Soolanayakanahally R, Kagale S, Pahari S, Kulkarni M, Wahab J, Bizimungu B. 2020. Drought-induced regulatory cascades and their effects on the nutritional quality of developing potato tubers. Genes(Basel), 11 (8):864.
[7]	Eid M A M, Abdel-Salam A A, Salem H M, Mahrous S E, Seleiman M F, Alsadon A A, Solieman T H I, Ibrahim A A. 2020. Interaction effects of nitrogen source and irrigation regime on tuber quality,yield,and water use efficiency of Solanum tuberosum L. Plants(Basel), 9 (1):110.
[8]	Goffart J P, Olivier M, Frankinet M. 2008. Potato crop nitrogen status assessment to improve N fertilization management and efficiency: past-present-future. Potato Research, 51 (3):355-383. doi: 10.1007/s11540-008-9118-x URL
[9]	Guo K, Bian X, Jia Z, Zhang L, Wei C. 2020. Effects of nitrogen level on structural and functional properties of starches from different colored-fleshed root tubers of sweet potato. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 164:3235-3242. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.199 pmid: 32861781
[10]	Hu Xin-xi, Feng Yan-qing, Lei Yan. 2015. Effects of nitrogen rate on plant growth of autumn potato crop and gene expression of nitrate reductase and ammonium transporter. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 42 (10):1974-1982. (in Chinese)
	胡新喜, 冯艳青, 雷艳. 2015. 不同施氮水平下秋马铃薯的生长以及StNR和StAT的表达. 园艺学报, 42 (10):1974-1982.
[11]	Ierna A, Pandino G, Lombardo S, Mauromicale G. 2011. Tuber yield,water and fertilizer productivity in early potato as affected by a combination of irrigation and fertilization. Agriculture Water Manage, 101 (1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.08.024 URL
[12]	Kahsay W S, Tejada Moral M. 2019. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on potatoes production in Ethiopia:a review. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5 (1):2-5.
[13]	Kondhare K R, Malankar N N, Devani R S, Banerjee A K. 2018. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis reveals small RNA profiles involved in early stages of stolon-to-tuber transitions in potato under photoperiodic conditions. BMC Plant Biology, 18 (1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1501-4 URL
[14]	Li W, Xiong B, Wang S, Deng X, Yin L, Li H. 2016. Regulation effects of water and nitrogen on the source-sink relationship in potato during the tuber bulking stage. PLoS ONE, 11 (1):e0146877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146877 URL
[15]	Li Y, Cui S, Zhang Z, Zhuang K, Wang Z, Zhang Q. 2020. Determining effects of water and nitrogen input on maize(Zea mays)yield,water-and nitrogen-use efficiency:a global synthesis. Scientific Report, 10 (1):96-99.
[16]	Meise P, Jozefowicz A M, Uptmoor R, Mock H P, Ordon F, Schum A. 2017. Comparative shoot proteome analysis of two potato(Solanum tuberosum L.)genotypes contrasting in nitrogen deficiency responses in vitro. Journal of Proteomics, 166:68-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.07.010 URL
[17]	Meng Li-li. 2020. Stem formation mechanism of horseshoe tuber and its response to variety and nitrogen[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Inner Mongolia:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
	孟丽丽. 2020. 马铃块茎茎形成机制及其对品种与氮素的响应[博士论文]. 内蒙古: 内蒙古农业大学.
[18]	Mu X, Chen Y. 2021. The physiological response of photosynthesis to nitrogen deficiency. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 158:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.019 URL
[19]	Ruchika, Csintalan Z, Péli E R. 2020. Effect of salicylic acid pre-treatment after long-term desiccation in the moss Syntrichia ruralis(Hedw.) Web. and Mohr. Plants(Basel), 9 (9):1097.
[20]	Serio F, Elia A, Signore A, Santamaria P. 2010. Influence of nitrogen form on yield and nitrate content of subirrigated early potato. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture, 84 (11):1428-1432.
[21]	Song Jin-xin, Gu Yan, Yu Han, Ning Xi-lin, Wu Chun-sheng, Hu Wen-he. 2019. Effects of plastic film mulching and nitrogen application rate on growth and yield of maize under drip irrigation. Molecular Plant Breeding, 17 (21):7251-7255. (in Chinese)
	宋金鑫, 谷岩, 于寒, 宁夕琳, 吴春胜, 胡文河. 2019. 覆膜和氮肥施用量对滴灌玉米生长发育及产量的影响. 分子植物育种, 17 (21):7251-7255.
[22]	Song Y, Li J, Liu M, Meng Z, Liu K, Sui N. 2019. Nitrogen increases drought tolerance in maize seedlings. Functional Plant Biology, 46 (4):350-359. doi: 10.1071/FP18186 URL
[23]	Sun N, Wang Y, Gupta S K, Rosen C J. 2020. Potato tuber chemical properties in storage as affected by cultivar and nitrogen rate:implications for acrylamide formation. Foods, 9 (3):352. doi: 10.3390/foods9030352 URL
[24]	Šrek P, Hejcman M, Kunzová E. 2010. Multivariate analysis of relationship between potato(Solanum tuberosum L.)yield,amount of applied elements,their concentrations in tubers and uptake in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Field Crops Research, 118:183-193. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.05.009 URL
[25]	Tiwari J K, Buckseth T, Zinta R, Saraswati A, Singh R K, Rawat S, Dua V K, Chakrabarti S K. 2020. Transcriptome analysis of potato shoots,roots and stolons under nitrogen stress. Scientfic Report, 10 (1):1152.
[26]	Tiwari J K, Plett D, Garnett T, Chakrabarti S K, Singh R K. 2018. Integrated genomics,physiology and breeding approaches for improving nitrogen use efficiency in potato:translating knowledge from other crops. Functional Plant Biology, 45 (6):587-605. doi: 10.1071/FP17303 URL
[27]	van Dingenen J, Hanzalova K, Abd Allah Salem M, Abel C, Seibert T, Giavalisco P, Wahl V. 2019. Limited nitrogen availability has cultivar-dependent effects on potato tuber yield and tuber quality traits. Food Chemistry, 288:170-177. doi: S0308-8146(19)30445-5 pmid: 30902278
[28]	Wang J, Li B R, Li X P. 2016. Evaluation of N fertilizers effects on grape based on the expression of N metabolic genes. Horticultural Plant Journal, 5:25-35.
[29]	Wu Liang, Zhang Wei-feng, Chen Xin-ping, Cui Zhen-ling, Fan Ming-sheng, Chen Qing, Zhang Fu-suo. 2016. Nitrogen fertilizer input and nitrogen use efficiency in Chinese farmland. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China,(4):76-83. (in Chinese)
	武良, 张卫峰, 陈新平, 崔振岭, 范明生, 陈清, 张福锁. 2016. 中国农田氮肥投入和生产效率. 中国土壤与肥料,(4):76-83.
[30]	Xu Guo-chang. 1997. Climate change in arid and semi-arid areas of China. Beijing: Meteorological Press. (in Chinese)
	徐国昌. 1997. 中国干旱半干旱区气候变化. 北京: 气象出版社.
[31]	Yan Xiao-yuan, Xia Long-long, Ti Chao-pu. 2018. Win-win nitrogen management practices for improving crop yield and environmental sustainability. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 (2):177-183. (in Chinese)
	颜晓元, 夏龙龙, 遆超普. 2018. 面向作物产量和环境双赢的氮肥施用策略. 中国科学院院刊, 33 (2):177-183.
[32]	Yao Chun-xia. 2012. Changes of water absorption capacity of maize roots under drought stress and rehydration conditions[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Yangling:Northwest A & F University. (in Chinese)
	姚春霞. 2012. 干旱胁迫及复水条件下玉米根系吸水能力的变化[博士论文]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
[33]	Yu Bang-qiang, Wu Lin-ke, Zhang Guo-hui, Jie Rui-xia, Wang Shou-liang. 2019. Effects of drip irrigation on the growth and development of potato. Water Saving Irrigation,(8):64-67. (in Chinese)
	余帮强, 吴林科, 张国辉, 颉瑞霞, 王收良. 2019. 膜下滴灌条件下不同补水量对主食化马铃薯生长发育的影响. 节水灌溉,(8):64-67.
[34]	Yu Bin, Yang Hong-yu, Wang Li, Liu Yu-hui, Bai Jiang-ping, Wang Di, Zhang Jun-lian. 2018. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits of potato germplasm resources in arid and semi-arid regions. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 44 (1):63-74. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00063 URL
	余斌, 杨宏羽, 王丽, 刘玉汇, 白江平, 王蒂, 张俊莲. 2018. 引进马铃薯种质资源在干旱半干旱区的表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 作物学报, 44 (1):63-74.
[35]	Zebarth B J, Rosen C J. 2007. Research perspective on nitrogen BMP development for potato. American Journal of Potato Research, 84 (1):3-18. doi: 10.1007/BF02986294 URL
[36]	Zhang H, Liu X, Song B, Nie B, Wei Zhang, Zhao Z. 2020b. Effect of excessive nitrogen on levels of amino acids and sugars,and differential response to post-harvest cold storage in potato(Solanum tuberosum L.)tubers. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 157:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.09.040 URL
[37]	Zhang Z, Tariq A, Zeng F, Graciano C, Zhang B. 2020a. Nitrogen application mitigates drought-induced metabolic changes in Alhagi sparsifolia seedlings by regulating nutrient and biomass allocation patterns. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 155:828-841. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.036 URL
[38]	Zierer W, Rüscher D, Sonnewald U, Sonnewald S. 2021. Tuber and tuberous root development. Annual Review Plant Biology, 72 (1):5-12.

处理 Treatment	水平 Level	苗期 Seedling period	块茎形成期 Tuber formation period	块茎膨大期 Tuber swelling period	淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation period
尿素/g	低 Insufficient	2.24	0	0	0
Urea	中Normal	4.67	1.33	0.67	0
	高 Excessive	7.78	2.22	1.11	0
水分/%	亏缺 Insufficient	35 ~ 45	45 ~ 55	50 ~ 60	30 ~ 40
Moisture	正常 Normal	55 ~ 65	65 ~ 75	70 ~ 80	50 ~ 60
	过量 Excessive	75 ~ 85	85 ~ 95	90 ~ 100	70 ~ 80

处理 Treatment	水平 Level	苗期 Seedling period	块茎形成期 Tuber formation period	块茎膨大期 Tuber swelling period	淀粉积累期 Starch accumulation period
尿素/g	低 Insufficient	2.24	0	0	0
Urea	中Normal	4.67	1.33	0.67	0
	高 Excessive	7.78	2.22	1.11	0
水分/%	亏缺 Insufficient	35 ~ 45	45 ~ 55	50 ~ 60	30 ~ 40
Moisture	正常 Normal	55 ~ 65	65 ~ 75	70 ~ 80	50 ~ 60
	过量 Excessive	75 ~ 85	85 ~ 95	90 ~ 100	70 ~ 80

品种 Variety	水分处理 Water treatment	氮素处理 Nitrogen treatment	单株块茎数 Number of tubers per plant	单株匍匐茎数 Number of stolons per plant	匍匐茎长度/ （cm · plant^-1） Stolon length
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18	亏缺 Insufficient irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.3 ± 2.1 a	9.0 ± 4.0 a	3.7 ± 3.5 cd
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	11.3 ± 2.1 a	3.3 ± 2.2 d
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	8.7 ± 3.8 a	3.6 ± 2.7 d
	正常 Normal irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	3.0 ± 2.6 a	12.0 ± 2.0 a	5.7 ± 4.8 bc
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	12.3 ± 6.7 a	7.7 ± 4.1 a
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	14.0 ± 6.0 a	5.3 ± 3.1 bcd
	过量 Excessive irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.6 ± 2.3 a	14.7 ± 3.1 a	4.6 ± 3.2 bcd
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	1.7 ± 2.1 a	9.3 ± 4.7 a	6.4 ± 4.6 ab
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	13.7 ± 1.5 a	6.2 ± 5.5 ab
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28	亏缺 Insufficient irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	3.3 ± 0.5 a	10.7 ± 4.7 a	4.5 ± 2.7 b
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	1.0 ± 1.7 a	5.3 ± 3.1 a	2.7 ± 1.8 b
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.7 ± 1.2 a	5.3 ± 1.5 a	3.3 ± 1.9 b
	正常 Normal irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.7 ± 0.6 a	9.0 ± 2.0 a	4.6 ± 2.8 b
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	0.3 ± 0.6 a	4.7 ± 0.6 a	4.5 ± 3.3 b
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	9.3 ± 7.1 a	3.7 ± 3.3 b
	过量 Excessive irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.0 ± 1.0 a	11.3 ± 3.5 a	4.1 ± 2.9 b
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	3.0 ± 2.6 a	11.3 ± 4.5 a	6.3 ± 3.3 a
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	2.3 ± 4.0 a	9.0 ± 5.6 a	3.7 ± 2.8 b

品种 Variety	水分处理 Water treatment	氮素处理 Nitrogen treatment	单株块茎数 Number of tubers per plant	单株匍匐茎数 Number of stolons per plant	匍匐茎长度/ （cm · plant^-1） Stolon length
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18	亏缺 Insufficient irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.3 ± 2.1 a	9.0 ± 4.0 a	3.7 ± 3.5 cd
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	11.3 ± 2.1 a	3.3 ± 2.2 d
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	8.7 ± 3.8 a	3.6 ± 2.7 d
	正常 Normal irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	3.0 ± 2.6 a	12.0 ± 2.0 a	5.7 ± 4.8 bc
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	12.3 ± 6.7 a	7.7 ± 4.1 a
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	14.0 ± 6.0 a	5.3 ± 3.1 bcd
	过量 Excessive irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.6 ± 2.3 a	14.7 ± 3.1 a	4.6 ± 3.2 bcd
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	1.7 ± 2.1 a	9.3 ± 4.7 a	6.4 ± 4.6 ab
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	13.7 ± 1.5 a	6.2 ± 5.5 ab
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28	亏缺 Insufficient irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	3.3 ± 0.5 a	10.7 ± 4.7 a	4.5 ± 2.7 b
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	1.0 ± 1.7 a	5.3 ± 3.1 a	2.7 ± 1.8 b
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.7 ± 1.2 a	5.3 ± 1.5 a	3.3 ± 1.9 b
	正常 Normal irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.7 ± 0.6 a	9.0 ± 2.0 a	4.6 ± 2.8 b
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	0.3 ± 0.6 a	4.7 ± 0.6 a	4.5 ± 3.3 b
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	0.0 ± 0.0 a	9.3 ± 7.1 a	3.7 ± 3.3 b
	过量 Excessive irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.0 ± 1.0 a	11.3 ± 3.5 a	4.1 ± 2.9 b
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	3.0 ± 2.6 a	11.3 ± 4.5 a	6.3 ± 3.3 a
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	2.3 ± 4.0 a	9.0 ± 5.6 a	3.7 ± 2.8 b

品种 Variety	水分处理 Water treatment	氮素处理 Nitrogen treatment	块茎数 Number of tuber	块茎质量/g Tuber weight	产量水分利用效率/ （kg · m^-3） Yield water use efficiency
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18	亏缺 Insufficient irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	3.8 ± 1.6 de	345.6 ± 84.7 d	13.9 ± 3.4 c
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	6.4 ± 1.5 abc	434.4 ± 70.7 c	18.0 ± 3.0 a
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	7.0 ± 1.9 abc	456.7 ± 72.5 c	16.3 ± 2.6 ab
	正常 Normal irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	2.8 ± 1.1 e	348.9 ± 49.1 d	10.4 ± 1.5 d
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	8.6 ± 2.1 ab	618.9 ± 38.3 b	14.5 ± 0.9 bc
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	7.4 ± 4.1 abc	711.1 ± 116.6 a	17.2 ± 2.8 a
	过量 Excessive irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	5.3 ± 1.4 cd	501.1 ± 103.9 c	11.0 ± 2.3 d
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	6.3 ± 2.3 bc	713.3 ± 84.0 a	14.3 ± 1.7 bc
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	8.7 ± 1.9 a	775.6 ± 84.7 a	14.7 ± 1.6 bc
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28	亏缺 Insufficient irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	4.2 ± 1.0 cd	335.6 ± 91.7 f	13.5 ± 3.7 a
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	6.1 ± 2.5 abc	372.3 ± 103.6 f	15.4 ± 4.3 a
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	7.0 ± 3.0 ab	417.8 ± 158.3 ef	15.0 ± 5.7 a
	正常 Normal irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	3.6 ± 1.1 d	490.0 ± 84.9 de	15.0 ± 2.5 a
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	4.9 ± 2.2 bcd	633.4 ± 66.9 bc	14.8 ± 1.6 a
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	6.4 ± 3.3 abc	637.2 ± 101.7 bc	14.2 ± 3.2 a
	过量 Excessive irrigation	低氮Insufficient nitrogen application	5.2 ± 2.4 abcd	566.7 ± 89.0 cd	12.3 ± 2.0 a
		中氮Normal nitrogen application	4.1 ± 1.2 cd	730.0 ± 85.3 ab	14.6 ± 1.7 a
		高氮Excessive nitrogen application	7.4 ± 2.6 a	796.2 ± 170.4 a	14.4 ± 3.6 a

The Effect of Water-nitrogen Coupling on Potato Photosynthesis,Tuber Formation and Quality

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 38

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

品种 Variety	回归方程 Regression equation	R²	P
中薯18号 Zhongshu 18	Y = 23.157 + 3604.530W + 64.937N-6815.557W²-5.926N² + 1087.906WN	0.772	0.0001
中薯28号 Zhongshu 28	Y =-125.872 + 16270.695W + 34.617N-69063.916W²-3.016N² + 316.745WN	0.618	0.0001

指标 Index	中薯18号 Zhongshu 18		中薯28号Zhongshu 28
指标 Index	灌水量 Irrigation	施氮量 Nitrogen	灌水量 Irrigation	施氮量 Nitrogen
块茎质量 Tuber weight	0.748^**	0.590^**	0.768^**	0.281^*
块茎数 Number of tubers	0.323^**	0.550^**	0.208	0.427^**
产量水分利用效率 Yield water use efficiency	-0.199	0.545^**	-0.068	0.130
叶绿素相对含量 Chlorophyll relative content	0.079	0.674**	0.290	0.644^**
净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate	0.149	0.548^**	0.436	0.301
叶鲜质量 Leaf fresh weight	0.427^*	0.613^**	0.454^*	0.748^**
地上茎鲜质量 Stem fresh weight	0.491^*	0.790^**	0.271	0.581^**
地下部鲜质量（不含块茎）Fresh weight of underground part（excluding tuber）	0.380	0.410^*	0.094	0.435^*
块茎淀粉含量 Starch content of tuber	0.037	0.549^**	0.091	0.588^**
块茎粗蛋白含量 Crude protein content of tuber	-0.117	0.652^**	0.042	0.682^**

指标Index	中薯18号Zhongshu 18	中薯28号Zhongshu 28
块茎数 Number of tubers	0.520^**	0.290^**
匍匐茎数 Number of stolons	0.011	0.063
叶绿素相对含量 Chlorophyll relative content	0.142	0.276
净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate	0.314	0.187
叶片鲜质量 Leaf fresh weight	0.602^**	0.207
茎鲜质量 Stem fresh weight	0.487	0.108
地下部鲜质量（不含块茎）Fresh weight of underground part（excluding tuber）	0.307	0.002

[1]	WANG Kuan, QI Lipan, WU Guili, FENG Yan, WANG Lei, YIN Jiang, LUO Yating, WANG Yan, LIU Chang, GONG Xuechen, and WANG Haijun. A New Potato Cultivar‘Beifang 002’of Early Maturity and Good Yield [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 141-142.
[2]	QI Lipan, FENG Yan, WANG Lei, YIN Jiang, WANG Kuan, LUO Yating, GONG Xuechen, LIU Chang, and WANG Yan. A New Potato Cultivar‘Beifang 004’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 143-144.
[3]	LI Yanshan, SUI Qijun, JIANG Wei, YANG Qiongfen, and BAI Jianming. A New Potato Cultivar‘Yunshu 113’for Both Fresh Consumption and Starch Extraction [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S2): 145-146.
[4]	ZOU Xue, DING Fan, LIU Lifang, YU Hankaizong, CHEN Nianwei, and RAO Liping. A New Purple Potato Cultivar‘Mianziyu 1’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(S1): 93-94.
[5]	QI Lipan, LI Yue, WANG Lei, FENG Yan, WANG Kuan, YIN Jiang, GUO Huachun. Anatomical Observation on the Graft Union Between Potato and Wolfberry [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(4): 868-874.
[6]	CHEN Jingyi, FANG Boping, ZHANG Xiongjian, HUANG Lifei, WANG Zhangying, and LUO Zhongxia. A New Leaf-vegetable Sweet Potato Cultivar‘Guangcaishu 5’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(S2): 2861-2862.
[7]	LUO Hongyu, YANG Jiangwei, FENG Ya, ZHANG Huanhuan, LIU Shengyan, ZHANG Ning, SI Huaijun. The Effect of Stu-miR156 Silencing by STTM Technology on Potato Lateral Root Development [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(3): 531-538.
[8]	SONG Yuhao, SHI Weiling, ZHANG Jiao, DING Zhenyu, PENG Hongxian, JIANG Chunyan, MA Qiuqin, LI Zhijing, ZHAO Yong, TANG Daobin, ZHANG Kai, WANG Jichun, LIU Xun. Development and Application of an Efficient Method for the Amylose/ Amylopectin Ratio Determination in Potato Tubers [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(3): 600-608.
[9]	LIU Cheng, WANG Shiyao, SHI Weiling, SONG Yuhao, JIANG Rui, ZHAO Yong, MO Shichun, LÜ Dianqiu, WANG Jichun, LIU Xun. Multiplex PCR Detection for Late Blight Resistant Genes R8,RB and Virus Resistant Genes Rx1,Ry_adg in Potato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(2): 389-396.
[10]	XU Guochun, LUO Wenbin, LI Huawei, XU Yongqing, JI Rongchang, ZHANG Hong, QIU Sixin, TANG Hao. Screening for Genetic Variation in Photosynthesis and High Photosynthetic Efficiency Germplasm in Potato [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(11): 2239-2250.
[11]	LI Peihua, PENG Zhengsong, XIA Mingzhong, CAI Guangze, YUAN Ying, FANG Zhirong, QU Jipeng, QING Yuan. Adaptable,High Yield and Disease Resistant Potato Cultivar‘Xiyu 3’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(10): 2115-2116.
[12]	LAN Mengjiao, WU Wensheng, XIAO Manqiu, PAN Hao, HOU Longying, GE Ruihua. A New Sweet Potato Cultivar‘Ganshu 4’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(10): 2117-2126.
[13]	JIAN Hongju, WAN Mengyuan, FU Yi, DING Yi, JU Xisan, SHANG Lina, LI Hui, WANG Jichun, HU Bogeng, LÜ Dianqiu. Genome-wide Identification and Expression Analysis of Chitinase Gene Family in Potato and Its Response to Exogenous Salicylic Acid and Jasmonic Acid [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2021, 48(1): 83-95.
[14]	LIANG Jingsi, ZHU Juli, XU Pei, ZHANG Pei, LI Canhui, and TANG Wei, . Research Progress of Phytoplasma and Potato Related Diseases [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(9): 1777-1792.
[15]	HE Zhen，DONG Tingting，WU Weiwen，CHEN Wen，and LI Liangjun*. Development and Evaluation of a Real-time Fluorescent Quantitative PCR Assay for Detection of Sweet Potato Latent Virus-Lotus in Lotus Plants [J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2020, 47(7): 1412-1420.