江南地区大棚促成—避雨栽培下葡萄品种光合特性的比较

园艺学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 17-22.

江南地区大棚促成—避雨栽培下葡萄品种光合特性的比较

戴美松^{1, 3} ;姜卫兵^1,3;庄猛¹;费宪进²;李传德²

¹南京农业大学园艺学院, 南京210095; ²镇江市园艺技术指导站, 镇江212003; ³浙江省农业科学院园艺研究所,杭州310021

收稿日期:2005-01-25 修回日期:2005-04-26 出版日期:2006-02-25 发布日期:2006-02-25

Comparison of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Seven Grapevine VarietiesCultivated in Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation Greenhouse

Dai Meisong^{1, 3};Jiang Weibing^1,3;,Zhuang Meng¹; Fei Xianjin²;Li Chuande²

¹College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing 210095, China; ² Instructional S tation of Horticulture, Zhenjiang 212003, China; ³ Institute of Horticulture, Zhejiang Academ y of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China

Received:2005-01-25 Revised:2005-04-26 Online:2006-02-25 Published:2006-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究表明, 促成—避雨栽培( Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation, F-C & R-S-C) 条件下7个葡萄品种: ①净光合速率( Pn) 日均值、光饱和点(LSP) 、光补偿点(LCP) 在促成阶段分别为CO₂ (5.74 ±4.33) ～ (7.87 ±5.85) 、494～1 110和9.6～5.15 μmol·m^-2 ·s^-1 , 在避雨阶段分别为(3.85±1.82) ～ (5.62 ±3.23) 、806～1 407和16.5～33.5 μmol·m^{- 2} ·s^{- 1} ; 各品种的CO₂ 饱和点(CSP) 、CO₂补偿点(CCP) 在促成阶段分别为717～1 500和60.6～88.0 μL·L^{- 1} , 在避雨阶段分别为944～1 601和
14.1～59.1 μL·L^{- 1} ; ②在促成阶段的Pn日均值、Pn日高峰值、Pn日积分值、气孔导度( Gs) 、蒸腾速率( Tr) 、LSP和CSP相对于避雨阶段较高, 光合表观量子效率(AQY) 、羧化效率(CE) 、LCP、CCP和多数品种的水分利用效率(WUE) 则较低; ③上述指标在不同栽培阶段各品种间的差异显著, 其中‘黎明无核’、‘里扎马特’和‘郑州早玉’的Pn日均值、WUE、AQY、CE、LSP和CSP均相对较高, 而LCP和CCP相对较低, 较适宜该种设施栽培。

关键词: 葡萄, 品种, 促成—避雨栽培, 光合特性

Abstract: Photosynthetic characteristics of 7 grapevine varieties were studied in Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation ( F-C & R-S-C) greenhouse by using portable photosynthetic mensurate system CIR-
AS-1. The results showed that: ①The value of Pn, LSP, LCP of grapevine varietieswere (5.74 ±4.33) -(7.87 ±5.85) ( is the mean of 7 data point in a day) , 494 - 1 110, 9.6 - 51.5 μmol·m^{- 2} ·s^{- 1} respectively during the F-C period, and (3.85 ±1.82) - ( 5.62 ±3.23) , 806 - 1 407, 16.5 - 33.5 μmol·m^-2 ·s^-1 respectively during the R-S-C period; The value of CSP, CCP of grapevine varieties were 717 - 1 500, 60.6 - 88.0 μL·L^-1 respectively during the F-C period, and 944 - 1 601, 14.1 - 59.1μL ·L^-1 respectively during the R-S-C period; ②There were higher value of diurnalmean of Pn, diurnal peak of Pn, diurnal integral of Pn, Gs, Tr, LSP, CSP and lower value of AQY, CE, LCP, CCP during the F-C period than those during the R-S-C period. WUE ofmost varieties are higher during the R-S-C period; ③Comparison of photosynthetic parameters before-mentioned, it showed that‘Dawn Seedless’,‘Rizamat’and ‘Zhengzhou Zaoyu’varieties had higher value of diurnal mean of Pn, WUE, AQY, CE, LSP, CSP and lower value of LCP, CCP than those of other varieties, thereby more adap ted to Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation greenhouse cultivation.

Key words: Grapevine, Variety, Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation, Photosynthetic characteristics

戴美松;;姜卫兵;庄猛;费宪进;李传德. 江南地区大棚促成—避雨栽培下葡萄品种光合特性的比较[J]. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(1): 17-22.

Dai Meisong;;Jiang Weibing;;Zhuang Meng;Fei Xianjin;Li Chuande. Comparison of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Seven Grapevine VarietiesCultivated in Forcing-cultivation and Rain-shelter-cultivation Greenhouse[J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2006, 33(1): 17-22.

[1]	王晓晨, 聂子页, 刘先菊, 段伟, 范培格, 梁振昌, . 脱落酸对‘京香玉’葡萄果实单萜物质合成的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 237-249.
[2]	王瑞, 洪文娟, 罗华, 赵丽娜, 陈颖, 王君, . 石榴品种SSR指纹图谱构建及杂种父本鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 265-278.
[3]	任海龙, 许东林, 张晶, 邹集文, 李光光, 周贤玉, 肖婉钰, 孙艺嘉. 菜薹KASP-SNP指纹图谱构建及品种鉴定[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 307-318.
[4]	孟秋峰, 汪炳良, 王毓洪, 黄芸萍, 王洁. 茎瘤芥新品种‘甬榨805’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 451-452.
[5]	于海龙, 张美彦, 李巧珍, 章炉军, 尚晓冬, 谭琦, 周峰, 李玉. 猪肚菇新品种‘申蕈1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 453-454.
[6]	王喜庆, 贾云鹤, 闫闻, 付永凯, 尤海波, 李冬艳, 赵景超. 高抗枯萎病西瓜新品种‘龙盛佳力’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 455-456.
[7]	朱炜, 曹津津, 陈曦, 张葳, 孙榕泽, 朱绍才, 赵家庚, 崔雅琦, 王宇暄, 于晓南. 芍药新品种‘粉罗裙’‘千重粉黛’‘笑春风’和‘碧叶粉荷’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 457-458.
[8]	邢柱东, 吕福堂, 郭尚敬, 张演义. 新品种‘聊大红金’桃[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 225-226.
[9]	李植良, 黎振兴, 李涛, 孙保娟, 李颖, 徐小万, 王恒明, 衡周, 宫超. 茄子新品种‘新丰3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 227-228.
[10]	蔡鹏, 房超, 李跃建, 刘独臣, 刘小俊, 梁根云. 茄子新品种‘天骄’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 229-230.
[11]	张红梅, 崔佳维, 余纪柱, 丁小涛, 何立中, 金海军. 苦瓜新品种‘青脆1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 231-232.
[12]	许申平, 袁秀云, 张燕, 何培, 崔波. 铁皮石斛新品种‘豫斛4号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 233-234.
[13]	韩晓蕾, 张彩霞, 刘锴, 杨安, 严家帝, 李武兴, 康立群, 丛佩华. 中熟苹果新品种‘中苹优蕾’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 1-2.
[14]	宋健坤, 杨英杰, 李鼎立, 马春晖, 王彩虹, 王然. 梨新品种‘鲁秀’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 3-4.
[15]	董星光, 曹玉芬, 张莹, 田路明, 霍宏亮, 齐丹, 徐家玉, 刘超, 王立东. 抗寒脆肉梨新品种‘玉翠香’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 5-6.