核桃属种质资源的EST-SSR标记研究

园艺学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 441-448.

核桃属种质资源的EST-SSR标记研究

齐建勋1,2，郝艳宾2,*，朱艳2，吴春林2，王维霞2，冷平1,*

（¹中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院，北京 100193；²北京市农林科学院林业果树研究所，北京100093）

收稿日期:2010-10-26 修回日期:2010-12-20 出版日期:2011-03-25 发布日期:2011-03-25
通讯作者: 郝艳宾

Studies on Germplasm of Juglans by EST-SSR Markers

QI Jian-xun1,2，HAO Yan-bin2,*，ZHU Yan2，WU Chun-lin2，WANG Wei-xia2，and LENG Ping1,*

（¹College of Agriculture and Biotechnology，China Agricultural University，Beijing 100193，China；²Institute of Forestry and Pomology，Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences，Beijing 100093，China）

Received:2010-10-26 Revised:2010-12-20 Online:2011-03-25 Published:2011-03-25
Contact: HAO Yan-bin

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 用18对EST-SSR引物对核桃属（Juglans L.）中的6个黑核桃组（Sect. Rhysocayon）样品、14个核桃楸组（Sect. Cardiocaryon）样品、28个核桃组（Sect. Juglans）样品和山核桃属（Carya Nutt）中的4个长山核桃（C. illinoinensis Koch.）样品进行了PCR扩增。在18个EST-SSR位点上共获得110个等位基因，每个位点扩增等位基因3 ~ 10个，平均6.1个；各位点的观察杂合度为0.057 ~ 0.574，平均为0.323；各位点PIC值在0.3723 ~ 0.8795之间，平均为0.6890。18对EST-SSR引物在长山核桃、黑核桃组、核桃楸组、铁核桃和核桃样品中，EST-SSR位点平均有效扩增率分别为87.5%、96.3%、98.8%、100%和99.8%，说明核桃EST-SSR在种、属间具有良好的通用性。聚类分析表明：在属间和核桃属内组间的聚类清晰，结果与传统分类一致。在核桃种内，参试样品可分为新疆、华北和西藏3个地理生态型，来自陕西的核桃样品与来自北京、山东、河南的样品混聚在一起，表明陕西核桃与华北核桃应属于同一地理生态型。在铁核桃种内，‘金沙江铁核桃1’、‘金沙江铁核桃2’与‘永平铁核桃1’聚为铁核桃种。‘三台’和‘丽江铁核桃1’铁核桃样品，还有‘丽江核桃1’与西藏核桃聚在一起，说明‘丽江核桃1’应属于西藏核桃地理生态型，并且部分铁核桃与西藏核桃的亲缘关系较近。这可能是由于铁核桃与核桃混生，自然杂交使一些铁核桃后代含有了核桃基因。

关键词: 核桃, EST-SSR, 亲缘关系, 地理生态型

Abstract: Eighteen EST-SSR primer pairs were used to amplify SSR fragments for 8 Sect. Rhysocayon samples，14 Sect. Cardiocaryon samples，28 Sect. Juglans samples in Juglans L. and 4 C. illinoinensis samples in Carya Nutt. The 18 pairs of EST-SSR primers generated a total of 110 alleles. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 3 to 10，and averaged 6.1. The observed heterozygosity（Ho）of 18 EST-SSR loci ranged from 0.057 to 0.574，and averaged 0.323. The value of allelic polymorphism information content（PIC）ranged from 0.3723 to 0.8795，and averaged 0.6890. The average percentage of available loci amplified in C. illinoinensis，Sect. Rhysocayon，Sect. Cardiocaryon，J. regia and J. sigillata samples are 87.5%，96.3%，98.8%，100% and 99.8%，respectively. It showed that the EST-SSR had good transferability among species in Juglans L. and Carya Nutt. In the dendrogram，the samples clustered clearly among species or sect. in Juglans L. and Carya Nutt，and the result accorded with the conventional taxonomy. In J. regia，the samples could be clustered into 3 ecological types，namely Xinjiang walnut，Huabei walnut and Tibet walnut. The walnut samples from Shaanxi clustered together with those from Beijing，Shandong and Henan. It indicated that Shaanxi walnuts and Huabei walnuts probably belonged to the same ecological type. In J. sigillata，‘Jinshajiang 1’，‘Jinshajiang 2’and‘Yongping Tie-walnut 1’clustered together as the group of J. sigillata. But the other two samples of J. sigillata，named‘Santai’and ‘Lijiang tie-walnut 1’，clustered together with‘Lijiang walnut 1’and Tibet walnuts. It indicated that，‘Lijiang walnut 1’should belong to Tibet walnut ecological type，and some samples of J. sigillata have closely relationship with Tibet walnuts. J. sigillata and J. regia live together，which possibly lead to some offspring of J. sigillata coming from J. Sigillata × J. regia.

Key words: walnut, EST-SSR, Relatedness, ecologicaltype

中图分类号:

S 664.1

齐建勋;郝艳宾;朱艳;吴春林;王维霞;冷平;. 核桃属种质资源的EST-SSR标记研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2011, 38(3): 441-448.

QI Jian-xun;HAO Yan-bin;ZHU Yan;WU Chun-lin;WANG Wei-xia;and LENG Ping;. Studies on Germplasm of Juglans by EST-SSR Markers[J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2011, 38(3): 441-448.

[1]	季琳琳, 陈素传, 吴志辉, 常君, 韩文妍, 陶汝鹏. 早花山核桃新品种‘宁国山核桃2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 53-54.
[2]	邢文曦, 王泽亮, 吴泞孜, 李丕军, 王静. 核桃良种‘盐源早’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 33-34.
[3]	蒋思思, 袁军, 周文君, 钮根花, 周俊琴. 薄壳山核桃（Carya illinoinensis）叶绿体基因组及其特征分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(8): 1772-1784.
[4]	张萌, 单玉莹, 杨业波, 翟飞飞, 王兆山, 巨关升, 孙振元, 李振坚. 中国石斛属植物遗传资源的AFLP分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(6): 1339-1350.
[5]	吴致君, 李伟, 王兴华, 张成, 蒋勋, 黎盛, 罗理勇, 孙康, 曾亮. 基于SLAF-seq的茶组子房室数不稳定居群种质亲缘关系分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(11): 2455-2470.
[6]	王翠香, 梁燕, 韩传明, 孙超, 孟晓烨, 谭淑玲, 张延兴, 陈爱昌, 崔鹏. 核桃新品种‘鲁绵2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(S2): 2801-2802.
[7]	陈素传, 季琳琳, 吴志辉, 常君, 陶汝鹏, 汪小进 . 大果山核桃新品种‘宁国山核桃3号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(S2): 2803-2804.
[8]	常君, 姚小华, 王开良, 滕建华, 邵慰忠, 张建忠, 李雪涛, 任华东, . 薄壳山核桃新品种‘亚优YLC21号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(S2): 2805-2806.
[9]	王鑫, 李明阳, 田琳, 刘冬云. 利用ISSR标记及rDNA-ITS序列分析河北省野生铁线莲的亲缘关系[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(9): 1755-1767.
[10]	鱼尚奇, 张锐, 郭众仲, 宋岩, 付嘉智, 武鹏雨, 马治浩. 核桃内果皮硬化期生长素动态变化及差异表达基因分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(3): 487-504.
[11]	许海峰, 陈新, 张士刚, 相昆, 张美勇, 徐颖, 王贵芳. 基于代谢组学分析‘秋香’核桃贮藏期间脂肪酸的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(11): 2161-2170.
[12]	刘枫, 赵宝军, 宫永红. 核桃新品种‘辽异1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(1): 195-196.
[13]	史敏华, 刘鑫, 刘劲. 核桃新品种‘晋黎’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 2919-2920.
[14]	韩传明, 孙超, 梁燕, 乔艳辉, 王翠香. 核桃新品种‘鲁绵1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 2921-2923.
[15]	王翠香, 孙超, 梁燕, 乔艳辉, 韩传明. 核桃新品种‘鲁莱1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 2923-2924.