亚精胺对猕猴桃采后抗氧化酶活性的影响

园艺学报 ›› 2002, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 173-175.

亚精胺对猕猴桃采后抗氧化酶活性的影响

闫瑞香¹ ;王仁才² ;关文强¹

(¹ 国家农产品保鲜工程技术研究中心, 天津300112 ;　²湖南农业大学园艺系, 长沙410128)

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2002-04-25 发布日期:2002-04-25

Effects of Spermidine on the Anti-Oxidization Enzyme of Kiwifruit during storage

Yan Ruixiang¹, Wang Rencai², and Guan Wenqiang¹

(¹ National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Agricultural Products Freshness Protection , Tianjin 300112 , China ;² Department of Hortscience , Hunan Agricultural University , Changsha 410128 , China)

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2002-04-25 Published:2002-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了不同亚精胺处理对猕猴桃采后抗氧化酶活性及保鲜效果的影响, 结果表明: 猕猴桃果
实采后(8 ±2) ℃条件下贮藏12 d , SOD 活性达到高峰; POD、CAT、ASP 活性高峰相对SOD 推迟约13 d。不同亚精胺处理均不同程度地延缓了SOD 活性高峰的出现, 提高了SOD、CAT 的活性, 减少了MDA 的积累,降低了POD、ASP 的活性峰值, 延长了猕猴桃的贮藏保鲜期, 其中以Spd 与NAA 结合处理的效果最为显著。

关键词: 猕猴桃, 亚精胺, 抗氧化酶

Abstract: The effects of various Spd treatment on the anti2oxidization enzymes and quality of kiwifruit (Actinidia Chinensis) were studied. The results showed that the peak of superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity has appeared after 12 days storage at (8 ±2) ℃, Comparatively , the peak of peroxidase ( POD) 、catalase (CAT) 、ascorbate specific peroxidase (ASP) activity postponed appearing after 25 days. All the Spd treatments postponed the appearance of SOD activity peak , increased SOD and CAT activity ; decreased the accumulation of malodiadehoyde (MDA) ; cut down POD activity peak , extended the time of storage. Spd and Spd + NAA dipping fruit treatments , were more effective than other treatment .

Key words: Kiwifruit, Spermidine, Anti-oxidization enzyme

中图分类号:

S 663. 4

闫瑞香;王仁才;关文强. 亚精胺对猕猴桃采后抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2002, 29(2): 173-175.

Yan Ruixiang;Wang Rencai;and Guan Wenqiang. Effects of Spermidine on the Anti-Oxidization Enzyme of Kiwifruit during storage[J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2002, 29(2): 173-175.

[1]	袁馨, 徐云鹤, 张雨培, 单楠, 陈楚英, 万春鹏, 开文斌, 翟夏琬, 陈金印, 甘增宇. 猕猴桃后熟过程中ABA响应结合因子AcAREB1调控AcGH3.1的表达[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 53-64.
[2]	宋放, 陈奇, 袁炎良, 陈沙, 尹海军, 蒋迎春, . 黄肉猕猴桃新品种‘先沃1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 47-48.
[3]	齐永杰, 高正辉, 马娜, 王清明, 柯凡君, 陈钱, 徐义流, . 黄肉抗溃疡病猕猴桃新品种‘皖农金果’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 49-50.
[4]	张慧琴, 楼国荣, 陆玲鸿, 古咸彬, 宋根华, 谢鸣. 黄肉中华猕猴桃新品种‘金义’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2): 51-52.
[5]	吕正鑫, 贺艳群, 贾东峰, 黄春辉, 钟敏, 廖光联, 朱壹, 袁开昌, 刘传浩, 徐小彪. 猕猴桃种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(7): 1571-1581.
[6]	李黎, 冯丹丹, 潘慧, 李文艺, 邓蕾, 汪祖鹏, 钟彩虹. 猕猴桃花粉灭菌方法比较及对果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4): 769-777.
[7]	杨妮, 万绮雯, 李逸民, 韩妙华, 滕瑞敏, 刘洁霞, 庄静. 外源亚精胺对盐胁迫下茶树光合特性及关键酶基因表达的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(2): 378-394.
[8]	吴小南, 王贺新, 谷岩, 徐国辉, 娄鑫, . 软枣猕猴桃新品种‘泉蜜’[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(S2): 2793-2794.
[9]	李贵生. 猕猴桃‘金艳'和‘红阳'果实转录组的比较分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(6): 1183-1196.
[10]	韩飞, 李大卫, 刘小莉, 张鹏, 陈美艳, 田华, 钟彩虹, . 特早熟高糖猕猴桃新品种‘金美’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 2909-2910.
[11]	韩飞, 李大卫, 刘小莉, 陈美艳, 张鹏, 张琦, 钟彩虹, . 红心猕猴桃新品种‘东玫’[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 2911-2912.
[12]	高萌，屈魏，冉昪，饶景萍*. ‘徐香’与‘海沃德’猕猴桃冷藏期间组织结构与生理变化差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(7): 1289-1300.
[13]	赵磊1，张元乐1，黄倩茹1，侯彩婷1，吴宽1,3，曹孟籍4，王乔春1,2,，吴云锋1,. 猕猴桃病毒A和B在陕西省的分布、分子变异与基因组研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(7): 1383-1390.
[14]	龙琴，谢宇，许兰珍，何永睿，邹修平，陈善春. 溃疡病菌侵染早期柑橘细胞程序性死亡的响应特征及机制[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(6): 1047-1058.
[15]	黄尧瑶1，邓明华2，彭春秀2，文锦芬1,*. 百合花瓣抗氧化酶系统对干旱胁迫响应的研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(4): 788-796.