https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner1.jpg|#|苹果
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner2.jpg|#|甘蓝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner3.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner4.jpg|#|灵芝
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner5.jpg|#|桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner6.jpg|#|黄瓜
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner7.jpg|#|蝴蝶兰
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner8.jpg|#|樱桃
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner9.jpg|#|观赏荷花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner10.jpg|#|菊花
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner11.jpg|#|月季
https://www.ahs.ac.cn/images/0513-353X/images/top-banner12.jpg|#|菊花

园艺学报 ›› 2002, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 78-80.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

玫瑰、月季、蔷薇等蔷薇属植物RAPD分析

陈向明1;郑国生2 , 3;孟 丽2


  

  1. (1 合肥教育学院, 合肥230001 ;2 山东农业大学生命科学学院, 泰安271018)
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2002-02-25 发布日期:2002-02-25

The RAPD analysis of the Rosa genus Plant of R. rugosa, R. chinensis and R.davurica

Chen Xiangming, Zheng Guosheng, and Meng Li
  

  1. (1 Hefei Educational College , Hefei 230001; 2 College of Life Science , Shangdong Agicultural University , Tai’an 271018)
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2002-02-25 Published:2002-02-25

摘要: 对蔷薇属的玫瑰、月季、蔷薇3 个种的15 个品种进行RAPD 分析, 16 个引物对受试品种PCR扩增共获得202 条谱带, 其中123 条(60. 9 %) 表现多态性。利用UPGAMA 法构建分子系统进化树, 以相似性系数0. 5 为阈值, 玫瑰与月季为一个聚类组, 蔷薇为另一个聚类组; 以相似性系数0. 6 为阈值, 4个蔷薇品种分为4 个不同的聚类组, 5 个月季品种为一个聚类组, 5 个玫瑰品种为一个聚类组, 平阴紫枝玫瑰单独为一个聚类组, 表明玫瑰与月季的亲缘关系较近, 两者与蔷薇的亲缘关系较远。

关键词: 玫瑰, 月季, 蔷薇, RAPD, 相似性系数, 遗传聚类组

Abstract: Rosa rugosa, R. chinensis and R. davurica are belonged to Rosa genus , 15 cultivars were amplified by 16 primers , which produced 202 bands and 123 polymorphism bands. And the genetic tree was constructed by the ways of UPGMA method. It confirmed that R. rugosa and R. chinensis belonged to the one cluster group and R. davurica belonged to another by the dissimilarity of 0. 5. Moreover , dissimilarity of 0. 65 could resulted in 4 R. davurica to be divided into 4 cluster groups , respectively. While 5 R. chinensis belonged to one group. Mean while , 5 R. rugosa were belonged to one group , and 1 R. rugosa was one independent group. Therefore , the genetic relationship was close between R. chinensis and R. rugosa , and they were distant to R. davurica in genetic relationship.

Key words: Rosa rugosa, R. chinensis, R. davurica, RAPD, Dissimilarity, Genetic groups

中图分类号: