炭疽菌对墨兰叶片3 种保护酶活性的影响

园艺学报 ›› 2004, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 822-824.

炭疽菌对墨兰叶片3 种保护酶活性的影响

王利国;李　玲^*;郭穗棉

(华南师范大学生命科学学院, 广东省植物发育生物工程重点实验室, 广州510631)

收稿日期:2004-04-15 修回日期:2004-10-13 出版日期:2004-12-25 发布日期:2004-12-25

Changes in Activities of Three Protective Enzymes in Leaves of Cymbidiumsinense after Inoculating Colletotrichum gloeosporioides

Wang Liguo; Li Ling^*; Guo Suimian

( Guangdong Key Lab of Biotechnology for Plant Development , College of Life Science , South China Normal University , Guangzhou 510631 , China)

Received:2004-04-15 Revised:2004-10-13 Online:2004-12-25 Published:2004-12-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了墨兰接种炭疽菌后SOD、POD 和PAL 活性的变化。结果显示: 与对照相比, 接种后36
h 之前PAL 活性变化不大, 36 h 后活性开始上升, 84 h 时达到最高; POD 在接种后12 和60 h 出现两个活性高峰, 且第1 峰大于第2 峰; SOD 在接种后12 h 达到最高, 之后下降。

关键词: 墨兰, 炭疽菌, 保护酶活性

Abstract: The occurrence of diseases and changes in activities of the three protective enzymes , phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) 、peroxidase ( POD) and superoxide dismutase ( SOD) in leaves of Cymbidium sinense,were studied after inoculating Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. The results showed that the activities of PAL increased significantly after 36 h inoculation with C. gloeosporioide , and reached the highest activities at 84 h. POD activities appeared two peaks at 12 h and 60 h , respectively , after inoculation. The first peak surpassed the second peak. SOD activities rose quickly after inoculation with C. gloeosporioide , and reached the highest level at 12 h ,
then fell . The increase in the activities of PAL , POD and SOD showed that these three enzymes play an important role in resisting the infection of C. gloeosporioide.

Key words: Cymbidium sinense, Colletotrichum gloeosporioide, Protective enzymes activities

中图分类号:

S 682.31

王利国;李　玲;郭穗棉. 炭疽菌对墨兰叶片3 种保护酶活性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2004, 31(6): 822-824.

Wang Liguo;Li Ling;Guo Suimian. Changes in Activities of Three Protective Enzymes in Leaves of Cymbidiumsinense after Inoculating Colletotrichum gloeosporioides[J]. ACTA HORTICULTURAE SINICA, 2004, 31(6): 822-824.

[1]	程庆华, 张志鹏, 吴艳萍, 万宇鹤, 陈应娟. 苦参碱对茶树炭疽菌的抑菌作用研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 432-440.
[2]	金建鹏, 高洁, 谢琦, 魏永路, 陆楚桥, 杨凤玺, 朱根发. 墨兰新品种‘四季花’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1): 127-128.
[3]	张世才, 李怡斐, 王春萍, 杨小苗, 黄启中, 黄任中. 辣椒种质尖孢炭疽菌抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4): 885-892.
[4]	魏永路1，金建鹏1，高洁1，郑睦銛2，陆楚桥1，杨凤玺1,，朱根发1,. 墨兰新品种‘迎春素’[J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(S2): 2873-2874.
[5]	谢月华1，邓文敏1，曾瑞珍2，杜国辉2，周珊珊2，郭和蓉2，谢利2，曾飞燕2，李今2，张志胜2,*. 兰花新品种‘君豪兰’[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(s2): 2721-2722.
[6]	刘春晓1，兰进好2，侯鸿敏1，张玉刚1，戴洪义1，刘源霞1,*. 苹果抗炭疽菌叶枯病基因相关的4 个分子标记的准确性验证[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(7): 1355-1362.
[7]	刘源霞1，兰进好2，柏素花3，孙晓红3，刘春晓1，张玉刚1，戴洪义1,. 苹果抗炭疽菌叶枯病基因SNP和InDel标记的HRM*筛选[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(2): 215-222.
[8]	刘宇松，段亚楠，陈学森，沈向，尹承苗，毛志泉. 老龄桃园土壤抑制平邑甜茶幼苗的生长[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(10): 1969-1977.
[9]	刘源霞1,2，李保华3，王彩虹2，刘春晓2，孔祥华2，祝军2，戴洪义2,*. 苹果对炭疽菌叶枯病抗性遗传的研究及其分子标记筛选[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 42(11): 2105-2112.
[10]	曾瑞珍1，谢利1，郭和蓉1，黎扬辉2，易懋升2，杜宝贵2，何燕1，张志胜1,*. 杂交兰新品种‘玉女兰’[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(2): 401-402.
[11]	张庆雨, 刘芳春, 段可, 王飞, 王延秀, 高清华. 水杨酸对草莓炭疽病响应基因FaNBS20 表达的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(1): 53-62.
[12]	李天来;李益清. 钙对弱光胁迫下番茄叶片保护酶活性及可溶性蛋白含量的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(11): 1601-1606.
[13]	姜　玲;张明涛;陈泽雄;马国华. 墨兰组织培养结合化学处理脱除建兰花叶病毒(CymMv) 的研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2005, 32(6): 1056-1060.
[14]	王利国;李　玲;范冬雨. 墨兰炭疽菌侵染过程与几丁质酶、β - 1,3 - 葡聚糖酶活性的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2005, 32(6): 1133-1135.
[15]	陈禅友;;汪汇东;丁　毅. 低温胁迫下长豇豆幼苗可溶性蛋白质和细胞保护酶活性的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2005, 32(5): 911-913.