园艺学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (9): 1907-1921.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0807
谭杉杉1, 仇亮1,3, 段奥其1, 束胜1,2, 曾晓萍4, 朱为民5, 贾敏1, 阎君5, 刘燕花1, 刘慧1, 熊爱生1()
收稿日期:
2022-01-04
修回日期:
2022-06-10
出版日期:
2022-09-25
发布日期:
2022-10-08
基金资助:
TAN Shanshan1, QIU Liang1,3, DUAN Aoqi1, SHU Sheng1,2, ZENG Xiaoping4, ZHU Weimin5, JIA Min1, YAN Jun5, LIU Yanhua1, LIU Hui1, XIONG Aisheng1()
Received:
2022-01-04
Revised:
2022-06-10
Online:
2022-09-25
Published:
2022-10-08
摘要:
芹菜种子小,且含有大量的萌发抑制物质,给其种苗繁育带来困难。采用培养皿培养和穴盘培养两种方式,用不同浓度(0、5%、10%、20%、40%)NaClO处理‘六合黄心芹’和‘赛雪’芹菜种子,对种子萌发指标、幼苗生长指标及光合参数进行测定,并分析幼苗中叶绿素含量变化以及相关基因表达。结果表明:5%次氯酸钠溶液处理芹菜种子,其发芽率、发芽势、发芽指数和活力指数最高,幼苗生长势最强,幼苗的壮苗指标、叶绿素含量以及净光合速率也有一定程度提高,相关基因的相对表达量也较高。这些结果说明次氯酸钠处理促进芹菜种子的适宜浓度为5%。
中图分类号:
谭杉杉, 仇亮, 段奥其, 束胜, 曾晓萍, 朱为民, 贾敏, 阎君, 刘燕花, 刘慧, 熊爱生. 不同浓度次氯酸钠处理芹菜种子对其萌发和幼苗质量的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(9): 1907-1921.
TAN Shanshan, QIU Liang, DUAN Aoqi, SHU Sheng, ZENG Xiaoping, ZHU Weimin, JIA Min, YAN Jun, LIU Yanhua, LIU Hui, XIONG Aisheng. Effects of Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite on Seeds Germination and Seedlings Quality of Celery[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(9): 1907-1921.
基因Gene | 序列(5′-3′)Sequence |
---|---|
脱植基叶绿素a氧化酶基因 CAO | F:TTGGTGAATGATAGGCTGTT;R:GGATGGTAAGGTTGGACTG |
叶绿素b还原酶基因 NOL | F:TCTCTTCTTCGCATCATCTT;R:TTGAGCCAGCATTGTTGA |
7-羟甲基叶绿素a还原酶基因 HCAR | F:CCAACTTAGCCTTATCATCTG;R:TGCCACAACATCCACAAT |
H亚基镁螯合酶基因 ChlH | F:GAATAGTAGCCGCATAGGAT;R:ACAAGAAGGTAGCCATCAC |
镁原卟啉氧甲基转移酶基因 ChlM | F:TATCAGTCTCCGCCATTTTCCCTCA;R:GTGTCCCCGTATATTTTCTTCCACC |
镁原卟啉Ⅸ单酯环化酶基因 MPE | F:ATGATACACTGAAGCGGATT;R:CCACTAATAAGCAGCAACAA |
脱镁叶绿素酶基因 PPH | F:CAAGCAGAGGCATCACAA;R:CCGTATAATGGAGACAACAAG |
脱镁叶绿酸氧化酶基因 PAO | F:ATGTGGAGGAACGGAAGA;R:GTAGGCATCTAACGGAAGG |
芹菜内参基因 Agactin | F:CTTCCTGCCATATATGATTGG;R:GCCAGCACCTCGATCTTCATG |
表1 荧光定量引物
Table 1 Primer sequences for RT-qPCR
基因Gene | 序列(5′-3′)Sequence |
---|---|
脱植基叶绿素a氧化酶基因 CAO | F:TTGGTGAATGATAGGCTGTT;R:GGATGGTAAGGTTGGACTG |
叶绿素b还原酶基因 NOL | F:TCTCTTCTTCGCATCATCTT;R:TTGAGCCAGCATTGTTGA |
7-羟甲基叶绿素a还原酶基因 HCAR | F:CCAACTTAGCCTTATCATCTG;R:TGCCACAACATCCACAAT |
H亚基镁螯合酶基因 ChlH | F:GAATAGTAGCCGCATAGGAT;R:ACAAGAAGGTAGCCATCAC |
镁原卟啉氧甲基转移酶基因 ChlM | F:TATCAGTCTCCGCCATTTTCCCTCA;R:GTGTCCCCGTATATTTTCTTCCACC |
镁原卟啉Ⅸ单酯环化酶基因 MPE | F:ATGATACACTGAAGCGGATT;R:CCACTAATAAGCAGCAACAA |
脱镁叶绿素酶基因 PPH | F:CAAGCAGAGGCATCACAA;R:CCGTATAATGGAGACAACAAG |
脱镁叶绿酸氧化酶基因 PAO | F:ATGTGGAGGAACGGAAGA;R:GTAGGCATCTAACGGAAGG |
芹菜内参基因 Agactin | F:CTTCCTGCCATATATGATTGG;R:GCCAGCACCTCGATCTTCATG |
品种 Cultivar | NaClO/% | 发芽势/% Germination potential | 发芽率/% Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | ||
六合黄心芹 Liuhe Huangxinqin | 0 | 65.33 a | 56.00 ab | 82.67 a | 70.44 ab | 6.82 a | 10.08 ab | 144.90 a | 286.10 b | |||
5 | 77.33 a | 69.33 a | 83.33 a | 81.78 a | 7.06 a | 11.89 a | 173.51 a | 371.48 a | ||||
10 | 62.00 a | 47.11 bc | 76.00 ab | 64.89 abc | 6.38 ab | 9.13 bc | 149.86 a | 224.99 bc | ||||
20 | 62.00 a | 49.11 b | 73.33 ab | 62.00 bc | 6.09 ab | 8.88 bc | 156.52 a | 211.95 c | ||||
40 | 42.67 b | 31.11 c | 62.00 b | 51.56 c | 4.92 b | 6.78 c | 79.69 b | 110.52 d | ||||
赛雪 Saixue | 0 | 59.67 b | 61.33 a | 76.67 b | 73.11 ab | 6.14 b | 10.60 ab | 178.35 b | 302.60 b | |||
5 | 75.87 a | 64.03 a | 91.33 a | 78.33 a | 7.54 a | 11.26 a | 235.33 a | 396.21 a | ||||
10 | 58.00 b | 50.22 b | 76.00 bc | 68.44 ab | 6.11 bc | 9.68 bc | 159.70 b | 310.39 b | ||||
20 | 61.33 b | 49.33 b | 72.67 bc | 67.33 b | 5.95 bc | 9.56 bc | 182.52 b | 209.57 c | ||||
40 | 47.00 c | 41.22 c | 62.00 c | 64.67 b | 4.96 c | 8.95 c | 79.97 c | 223.81 c |
表2 不同浓度次氯酸钠处理的芹菜种子萌发情况
Table 2 Germination of celery seeds under different concentrations of NaClO treatments
品种 Cultivar | NaClO/% | 发芽势/% Germination potential | 发芽率/% Germination rate | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | ||
六合黄心芹 Liuhe Huangxinqin | 0 | 65.33 a | 56.00 ab | 82.67 a | 70.44 ab | 6.82 a | 10.08 ab | 144.90 a | 286.10 b | |||
5 | 77.33 a | 69.33 a | 83.33 a | 81.78 a | 7.06 a | 11.89 a | 173.51 a | 371.48 a | ||||
10 | 62.00 a | 47.11 bc | 76.00 ab | 64.89 abc | 6.38 ab | 9.13 bc | 149.86 a | 224.99 bc | ||||
20 | 62.00 a | 49.11 b | 73.33 ab | 62.00 bc | 6.09 ab | 8.88 bc | 156.52 a | 211.95 c | ||||
40 | 42.67 b | 31.11 c | 62.00 b | 51.56 c | 4.92 b | 6.78 c | 79.69 b | 110.52 d | ||||
赛雪 Saixue | 0 | 59.67 b | 61.33 a | 76.67 b | 73.11 ab | 6.14 b | 10.60 ab | 178.35 b | 302.60 b | |||
5 | 75.87 a | 64.03 a | 91.33 a | 78.33 a | 7.54 a | 11.26 a | 235.33 a | 396.21 a | ||||
10 | 58.00 b | 50.22 b | 76.00 bc | 68.44 ab | 6.11 bc | 9.68 bc | 159.70 b | 310.39 b | ||||
20 | 61.33 b | 49.33 b | 72.67 bc | 67.33 b | 5.95 bc | 9.56 bc | 182.52 b | 209.57 c | ||||
40 | 47.00 c | 41.22 c | 62.00 c | 64.67 b | 4.96 c | 8.95 c | 79.97 c | 223.81 c |
品种 Cultivar | NaClO/% | 根长/mm Root length | 下胚轴长/mm Hypocotyl length | 单株鲜质量/mg Fresh weight per plant | 单株干质量/mg Dry weight per plant | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | |||
六合黄心芹 Liuhe Huangxinqin | 0 | 21.25 ab | 28.39 ab | 9.59 bc | 13.38 b | 3.82 d | 4.65 c | 0.28 c | 0.35 ab | |||
5 | 24.57 a | 31.25 a | 10.26 b | 13.41 b | 5.29 b | 5.19 b | 0.33 a | 0.36 a | ||||
10 | 23.50 a | 24.64 b | 14.59 a | 10.61 b | 5.43 a | 5.27 a | 0.33 a | 0.36 a | ||||
20 | 25.71 a | 23.87 b | 8.11 c | 13.59 b | 5.43 a | 5.20 b | 0.30 b | 0.35 ab | ||||
40 | 16.21 b | 16.31 c | 8.17 c | 26.91 a | 4.14 c | 3.32 d | 0.29 bc | 0.22 c | ||||
赛雪Saixue | 0 | 29.03 a | 28.56 abc | 14.47 a | 10.35 b | 4.20 d | 5.99 c | 0.30 c | 0.46 b | |||
5 | 31.20 a | 35.19 a | 15.13 a | 14.43 b | 4.72 b | 6.57 b | 0.36 b | 0.53 a | ||||
10 | 26.15 ab | 32.05 ab | 11.51 b | 11.07 b | 4.80 a | 6.99 a | 0.47 a | 0.42 bc | ||||
20 | 30.69 a | 21.93 c | 11.41 b | 13.89 b | 4.62 c | 5.65 d | 0.36 b | 0.37 d | ||||
40 | 16.11 b | 25.02 bc | 8.73 c | 20.01 a | 4.61 c | 6.53 b | 0.30 c | 0.38 cd |
表3 不同浓度次氯酸钠处理芹菜种子对其20 d龄幼苗生长情况的影响
Table 3 Effects of the growth of 20-day-old seedlings under different concentrations of NaClO treatments
品种 Cultivar | NaClO/% | 根长/mm Root length | 下胚轴长/mm Hypocotyl length | 单株鲜质量/mg Fresh weight per plant | 单株干质量/mg Dry weight per plant | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | | 培养皿培养 In petri dishes | 穴盘培养 In acupoint dishes | |||
六合黄心芹 Liuhe Huangxinqin | 0 | 21.25 ab | 28.39 ab | 9.59 bc | 13.38 b | 3.82 d | 4.65 c | 0.28 c | 0.35 ab | |||
5 | 24.57 a | 31.25 a | 10.26 b | 13.41 b | 5.29 b | 5.19 b | 0.33 a | 0.36 a | ||||
10 | 23.50 a | 24.64 b | 14.59 a | 10.61 b | 5.43 a | 5.27 a | 0.33 a | 0.36 a | ||||
20 | 25.71 a | 23.87 b | 8.11 c | 13.59 b | 5.43 a | 5.20 b | 0.30 b | 0.35 ab | ||||
40 | 16.21 b | 16.31 c | 8.17 c | 26.91 a | 4.14 c | 3.32 d | 0.29 bc | 0.22 c | ||||
赛雪Saixue | 0 | 29.03 a | 28.56 abc | 14.47 a | 10.35 b | 4.20 d | 5.99 c | 0.30 c | 0.46 b | |||
5 | 31.20 a | 35.19 a | 15.13 a | 14.43 b | 4.72 b | 6.57 b | 0.36 b | 0.53 a | ||||
10 | 26.15 ab | 32.05 ab | 11.51 b | 11.07 b | 4.80 a | 6.99 a | 0.47 a | 0.42 bc | ||||
20 | 30.69 a | 21.93 c | 11.41 b | 13.89 b | 4.62 c | 5.65 d | 0.36 b | 0.37 d | ||||
40 | 16.11 b | 25.02 bc | 8.73 c | 20.01 a | 4.61 c | 6.53 b | 0.30 c | 0.38 cd |
苗龄/d Seeding age | 品种 Cultivar | NaClO/% | 株高/cm Height | 茎粗/mm Diameter | 鲜质量/mg Fresh weight | 干质量/mg Dry weight | 壮苗指数 Seedling strength index | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部 Aboveground | 地下部 Underground | 地上部 Aboveground | 地下部 Underground | |||||||
40 | 六合黄心芹 Liuhe Huangxinqin | 0 | 12.10 a | 0.78 bc | 240 b | 9.50 a | 17.30 c | 0.70 b | 0.84 c | |
5 | 12.77 a | 0.98 a | 300 a | 9.10 b | 21.50 a | 0.87 a | 1.08 a | |||
10 | 10.20 b | 0.89 ab | 290 a | 7.40 c | 19.10 b | 0.73 b | 0.93 b | |||
20 | 8.80 b | 0.88 ab | 180 c | 4.10 e | 12.10 d | 0.47 c | 0.61 d | |||
40 | 6.93 c | 0.72 c | 130 d | 5.00 d | 8.00 e | 0.23 d | 0.32 e | |||
赛雪Saixue | 0 | 10.27 b | 0.96 a | 200 a | 9.90 a | 11.35 c | 0.48 b | 0.61 b | ||
5 | 12.20 a | 0.98 a | 210 a | 9.90 a | 12.50 a | 0.83 a | 0.99 a | |||
10 | 10.43 b | 0.75 b | 160 c | 4.40 b | 11.85 b | 0.27 d | 0.36 d | |||
20 | 10.37 b | 0.74 b | 150 c | 4.98 b | 9.80 d | 0.33 c | 0.41 c | |||
40 | 10.23 b | 0.75 b | 180 b | 2.78 c | 9.85 d | 0.30 cd | 0.38 cd | |||
60 | 六合黄心芹 Liuhe Huangxinqin | 0 | 13.20 b | 1.03 c | 540 b | 32.10 b | 36.20 b | 3.30 bc | 3.91 c | |
5 | 16.80 a | 1.68 a | 580 a | 89.60 a | 40.00 a | 7.70 a | 9.66 a | |||
10 | 13.40 b | 1.22 b | 370 c | 11.00 c | 23.10 c | 2.80 c | 3.37 d | |||
20 | 11.20 c | 0.95 cd | 240 d | 33.40 b | 13.90 d | 3.50 b | 4.53 b | |||
40 | 10.40 cd | 0.77 d | 180 e | 5.60 d | 8.60 e | 0.50 d | 0.60 e | |||
赛雪Saixue | 0 | 12.70 bc | 1.02 bc | 310 b | 24.80 a | 19.50 b | 2.20 a | 2.62 ab | ||
5 | 14.70 a | 1.40 a | 460 a | 25.70 a | 26.80 a | 2.20 a | 2.66 a | |||
10 | 11.90 d | 1.09 b | 290 c | 22.40 b | 17.30 b | 1.60 c | 1.92 d | |||
20 | 12.80 bc | 0.95 c | 210 d | 21.10 b | 12.90 c | 2.10 ab | 2.55 bc | |||
40 | 13.40 b | 0.86 d | 220 d | 17.50 c | 10.00 cd | 1.70 b | 2.06 cd |
表4 不同浓度次氯酸钠处理芹菜种子对其40和60 d龄幼苗壮苗指标的影响
Table 4 Effects of seedling indexes of 40- and 60-day-old celery seedlings under different concentrations of NaClO treatments
苗龄/d Seeding age | 品种 Cultivar | NaClO/% | 株高/cm Height | 茎粗/mm Diameter | 鲜质量/mg Fresh weight | 干质量/mg Dry weight | 壮苗指数 Seedling strength index | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部 Aboveground | 地下部 Underground | 地上部 Aboveground | 地下部 Underground | |||||||
40 | 六合黄心芹 Liuhe Huangxinqin | 0 | 12.10 a | 0.78 bc | 240 b | 9.50 a | 17.30 c | 0.70 b | 0.84 c | |
5 | 12.77 a | 0.98 a | 300 a | 9.10 b | 21.50 a | 0.87 a | 1.08 a | |||
10 | 10.20 b | 0.89 ab | 290 a | 7.40 c | 19.10 b | 0.73 b | 0.93 b | |||
20 | 8.80 b | 0.88 ab | 180 c | 4.10 e | 12.10 d | 0.47 c | 0.61 d | |||
40 | 6.93 c | 0.72 c | 130 d | 5.00 d | 8.00 e | 0.23 d | 0.32 e | |||
赛雪Saixue | 0 | 10.27 b | 0.96 a | 200 a | 9.90 a | 11.35 c | 0.48 b | 0.61 b | ||
5 | 12.20 a | 0.98 a | 210 a | 9.90 a | 12.50 a | 0.83 a | 0.99 a | |||
10 | 10.43 b | 0.75 b | 160 c | 4.40 b | 11.85 b | 0.27 d | 0.36 d | |||
20 | 10.37 b | 0.74 b | 150 c | 4.98 b | 9.80 d | 0.33 c | 0.41 c | |||
40 | 10.23 b | 0.75 b | 180 b | 2.78 c | 9.85 d | 0.30 cd | 0.38 cd | |||
60 | 六合黄心芹 Liuhe Huangxinqin | 0 | 13.20 b | 1.03 c | 540 b | 32.10 b | 36.20 b | 3.30 bc | 3.91 c | |
5 | 16.80 a | 1.68 a | 580 a | 89.60 a | 40.00 a | 7.70 a | 9.66 a | |||
10 | 13.40 b | 1.22 b | 370 c | 11.00 c | 23.10 c | 2.80 c | 3.37 d | |||
20 | 11.20 c | 0.95 cd | 240 d | 33.40 b | 13.90 d | 3.50 b | 4.53 b | |||
40 | 10.40 cd | 0.77 d | 180 e | 5.60 d | 8.60 e | 0.50 d | 0.60 e | |||
赛雪Saixue | 0 | 12.70 bc | 1.02 bc | 310 b | 24.80 a | 19.50 b | 2.20 a | 2.62 ab | ||
5 | 14.70 a | 1.40 a | 460 a | 25.70 a | 26.80 a | 2.20 a | 2.66 a | |||
10 | 11.90 d | 1.09 b | 290 c | 22.40 b | 17.30 b | 1.60 c | 1.92 d | |||
20 | 12.80 bc | 0.95 c | 210 d | 21.10 b | 12.90 c | 2.10 ab | 2.55 bc | |||
40 | 13.40 b | 0.86 d | 220 d | 17.50 c | 10.00 cd | 1.70 b | 2.06 cd |
图3 不同浓度次氯酸钠处理芹菜种子对其20、40和60 d幼苗叶绿素含量的影响 不同字母表示两品种在不同浓度次氯酸钠处理下P < 0.05的显著性。下同。
Fig. 3 Effects of chlorophyll content of celery seedlings at 20,40 and 60 d under different concentrations of NaClO treatments Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between the two cultivars at P < 0.05 under different concentrations of NaClO treatments. The same below.
[1] |
Baskin J M, Baskin C C. 2004. A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Science Research, 14 (1):1-16.
doi: 10.1079/SSR2003150 URL |
[2] | Cao Ling-ling. 2018. Intensive plug seedling technology of celery. China Vegetables,(12):91-93. (in Chinese) |
曹玲玲. 2018. 芹菜集约化穴盘育苗关键技术. 中国蔬菜,(12):91-93. | |
[3] | Chen Zi-jing, Yu Qian, Ding Yun-yu, Cao Zhi-fu, Wang Qian. 2016. The effect of seed priming on celery seed germination,seedling growth and yield. Seeds, 35 (4):26-29. (in Chinese) |
陈子敬, 于茜, 丁云玉, 曹之富, 王倩. 2016. 种子引发对芹菜种子发芽、幼苗生长及产量的影响. 种子, 35 (4):26-29. | |
[4] | Fu Shu,Liu Zhao-xia,Chen Jin-zhi,Sun Geng-xiao,Sun Cui-ying,Jin Chen,Yang Guang. 2019. Optimization of seed sterilization and rooting medium for regeneration of Brassica napus. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 34 (12):1371-1378. (in Chinese) |
傅淑, 刘昭霞, 陈金芝, 孙庚晓, 孙翠英, 陈进, 杨广. 2019. 甘蓝型油菜再生体系中的种子灭菌和生根培养基的优化. 福建农业学报, 34 (12):1371-1378. | |
[5] | Fu Ting-ting, Cheng Hong-yan, Song Song-quan. 2009. Advances in studies of seed dormancy. Bulletin of Botany, 44 (5):629-641. (in Chinese) |
付婷婷, 程红焱, 宋松泉. 2009. 种子休眠的研究进展. 植物学报, 44 (5):629-641. | |
[6] | Gao Guo-xun, Wu Feng, Wang Wu-tai, Liu Jun-huan, Liu Hui-jing, Meng Qing-liang, Hao Jian-quan. 2019. Reasons and countermeasures for the low germination rate of celery seeds. China Vegetables,(9):87-88. (in Chinese) |
高国训, 吴锋, 王武台, 刘俊环, 刘惠静, 孟庆良, 郝建全. 2019. 芹菜种子发芽率低的原因与对策. 中国蔬菜,(9):87-88. | |
[7] | Gu Da-guo, Zhu Zhen-hua, Jia Li-li, Ji Wei-wei, Liu Jie-xia, Wang Hao, Shen Di, Huang Zhi-wu, Yang Xue-dong, Zhu Wei-min, Xiong Ai-sheng. 2021. The main varieties of celery planted in Shanghai and the key points of cultivation. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables,(5):11-13. (in Chinese) |
顾大国, 朱振华, 贾丽丽, 季维维, 刘洁霞, 王昊, 沈迪, 黄志午, 杨学东, 朱为民, 熊爱生. 2021. 上海地区芹菜种植主要品种及其栽培要点. 长江蔬菜,(5):11-13. | |
[8] | He Hong-yun, Xue Lin, Tian Li-ping, Chen Yuan-liang. 2008. Evaluation on low temperature and light intensity tolerance of different watermelon varieties at seedling stage. Northern Horticulture,(4):13-16. (in Chinese) |
和红云, 薛琳, 田丽萍, 陈远良. 2008. 低温胁迫对甜瓜幼苗叶绿素含量及荧光参数的影响. 北方园艺,(4):13-16. | |
[9] |
Huang C, David M P, Cao Z L, Xiao L T. 2020. Mutation of chloroplast CHLM contributes to down-regulation of multiple stress response genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Growth Regulation, 91 (2):209-219.
doi: 10.1007/s10725-020-00600-9 URL |
[10] |
Huang W, Ma H Y, Huang Y, Li Y, Wang G L, Jiang Q, Wang F, Xiong A S. 2017. Comparative proteomic analysis provides novel insights into chlorophyll biosynthesis in celery under temperature stress. Physiologia Plantarum, 161 (4):468-485.
doi: 10.1111/ppl.12609 URL |
[11] | Jia Li-li, Chen Long-zheng, Lu Xiao-hua, Tao Jian-ping, Liu Jie-xia, Liu Hui-ji, Xiong Ai-sheng. 2021. Comparison and evaluation of agronomic traits of celery transplanted in autumn-winter in southern Jiangsu Province. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 37 (1):1-7. (in Chinese) |
贾丽丽, 陈龙正, 路晓华, 陶建平, 刘洁霞, 刘惠吉, 熊爱生. 2021. 苏南地区秋冬茬移栽芹菜农艺性状的比较与评价. 上海农业学报, 37 (1):1-7. | |
[12] |
Jia X L, Wang G L, Xiong F, Yu X R, Xu Z S, Wang F, Xiong A S. 2015. De novo assembly,transcriptome characterization,lignin accumulation,and anatomic characteristics:novel insights into lignin biosynthesis during celery leaf development. Scientific Reports, 5:8259.
doi: 10.1038/srep08259 URL |
[13] |
Jiang Shu-kun, Zhang Xi-juan, Xu Zheng-jin, Chen Wen-fu. 2010. Comparison between QTLs for chlorophyll content and genes controlling chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation in Japonica rice(Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 36 (3):376-384. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00376 |
姜树坤, 张喜娟, 徐正进, 陈温福. 2010. 粳稻叶绿素含量QTL与其合成降解相关基因的比较分析. 作物学报, 36 (3):376-384.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00376 |
|
[14] |
Jung K H, Hur J, Ryu C H, Choi Y, Chung Y Y, Miyao A, Hirochika H, An G. 2003. Characterization of a rice chlorophyll-deficient mutant using the T-DNA gene-trap system. Plant Cell Physiology, 44 (5):463-472.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcg064 URL |
[15] | Koichi K, Tatsuru M. 2016. Transcriptional regulation of tetrapyrrole biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7:1811. |
[16] |
Koziol A G, Borza T, Ishida K I, Keeling P, Lee R W, Durnford D G. 2007. Tracing the evolution of the light-harvesting antennae in chlorophyll a/b-containing organisms. Plant Physiology, 143 (4):1802-1816.
pmid: 17307901 |
[17] | Li Kai,Zhang Lili,Shao Changyong,Zhong Chongshan,Cao Bili,Shi Qinghua,Gong Biao. 2021. Effects of cold plasma seed treatment on tomato seedling growth and light energy utilization under daytime sub-high temperature environment. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 48 (11):2286-2298. (in Chinese) |
李恺, 张丽丽, 邵长勇, 仲崇山, 曹逼力, 史庆华, 巩彪. 2021. 亚高温下冷等离子体处理番茄种子对幼苗生长和光能利用的影响. 园艺学报, 48 (11):2286-2298. | |
[18] |
Li M Y, Hou X L, Wang F, Tan G F, Xu Z S, Xiong A S. 2018. Advances in the research of celery,an important Apiaceae vegetable crop. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 38 (2):172-183.
doi: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1312275 URL |
[19] | Li Yue, Wu Yun, Mohamed M,Lü Xue-si,Ren Zi-ming,Sun Min-yi,Xia Yi-ping. 2017. Aseptic germination and bulblet formation of wild tulip (Tulipa sinkiangensi). Journal of Zhejiang University(Agriculture & Life Sciences), 43 (3):307-316. (in Chinese) |
李岳, 吴昀, Mohamed M, 吕学思, 任梓铭, 夏宜平.孙敏译, 2017. 野生郁金香种子无菌萌发及小鳞茎形成. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 43 (3):307-316. | |
[20] | Lichtenthaler H K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids:Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology, 148 (1):350-382. |
[21] | Lin Rong-yan, Chen Yi-quan, Wu Jian-she, Lin Bing, Ye Xiu-xian, Zhong Huai-qin. 2020. Cloning and transcription expression analysis of magnesium-protoporphyrin IX monomethyl eter cyclase gene in Cymbidium hybrid. Chinese Journal of Cell Biology, 42 (10):1738-1747. (in Chinese) |
林榕燕, 陈艺荃, 吴建设, 林兵, 叶秀仙, 钟淮钦. 2020. 杂交兰镁原卟啉Ⅸ甲酯环化酶基因的克隆与转录表达分析. 中国细胞生物学学报, 42 (10):1738-1747. | |
[22] | Liu Fengjiao, Zhang Xiaowei, Li Fude, Zhai Jiang, Bi Huangai, Ai Xizhen. 2020. Effect of exogenous hydrogen on photosynthetic carbon assimilation and nitrogen metabolism of cucumber seedlings under low temperature. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (2):287-300. (in Chinese) |
刘丰娇, 张晓伟, 李福德, 翟江, 毕焕改, 艾希珍. 2020. 黄瓜富氢水浸种对低温下幼苗光合碳同化及氮代谢的影响. 园艺学报, 47 (2):287-300. | |
[23] | Liu H H, Zheng C C. 2008. MPEC:an important gene in the chlorophyll biosynthesis pathway in photosynthetic organisms. Photosynthetica, 46 (3):321. |
[24] | Liu Hao, Yang Yu-qing, Shao Yi-fei, Gao Wei,Chen Yong-chen,Yao Yu-feng. 2019. Exploration for the disinfectant method of tomato seed. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 50 (3):393-398. (in Chinese) |
刘昊, 杨雨晴, 邵一飞, 高伟, 陈永臣, 姚宇峰. 2019. 番茄种子消毒方法探究. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 50 (3):393-398. | |
[25] | Liu Xiao-hong, Bao Xue-yin, Zhao Qing, Liu Gui-xia. 2014. Effects of different disinfectants on sterilization and germination of Allium ramosum L. Seeds, 33 (2):23-25. (in Chinese) |
刘晓红, 鲍雪银, 赵晴, 刘桂霞. 2014. 不同消毒剂对野韭种子消毒效果及萌发的影响. 种子, 33 (2):23-25. | |
[26] |
Liu Y M, Du Q H, Bai L Q, Sun M T, Li Y S, He C X, Wang J, Yu X C, Yan Y. 2021. Interference of CsGPA1,the α-submit of G protein,reduces drought tolerance in cucumber seedlings. Horticultural Plant Journal, 7 (8):209-220.
doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2021.02.003 URL |
[27] | Lu Li-ming, An Ying. 2012. Effects of NaClO on tobacco aseptic seedling growth. Crops Journal,(3):141-143. (in Chinese) |
鲁黎明, 安影. 2012. 次氯酸钠对烟草无菌苗生理指标的影响. 作物杂志,(3):141-143. | |
[28] | Ma Meng-xue, Zhao Ling-ling, Tang Si, Chen Xian-jun, Qin Rui. 2018. The effects of different disinfection methods on seed germination and study on the environmental bacteria in safflower(Carthamus tinctorius L.). Crops Journal,(6):162-167. (in Chinese) |
马梦雪, 赵玲玲, 唐思, 陈贤军, 覃瑞. 2018. 消毒方法对红花种子发芽率的影响和种子环境细菌研究. 作物杂志,(6):162-167. | |
[29] |
Masuda T. 2008. Recent overview of the Mg branch of the tetrapyrrole biosynthesis leading to chlorophylls. Photosynthesis Research, 96 (2):121-143.
doi: 10.1007/s11120-008-9291-4 pmid: 18273690 |
[30] | Mu Yan-juan, Yang Yue-ming, Wang Li-li, Han Biao, Xian Yang, Xie Xiao-man, Li Wen-qing, Lu Yi-zeng. 2021. Acer truncatum seed germination and its response to different disinfection treatments. Forestry Science and Technology,(9):17-22. (in Chinese) |
穆艳娟, 杨月明, 王丽丽, 韩彪, 咸洋, 解孝满, 李文清, 陆璐, 鲁仪增. 2021. 元宝枫种子萌发及其对不同消毒处理的响应. 林业科技通讯,(9):17-22. | |
[31] |
Proietti P, Palliotti A, Famiani F, Antognozzi E, Ferranti F, Andreutti R, Frenguelli G. 2000. Influence of leaf position,fruit and light availability on photosynthesis of two chestnut genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae, 85 (1-2):63-73.
doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00129-6 URL |
[32] |
Saajah J K, Maalekuu B K. 2014. Determination of postharvest pod storage on viability and seedling growth performance of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) in the nursery. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6 (4):77-90.
doi: 10.5539/jas.v6n4p77 URL |
[33] |
Sato R, Ito H, Tanaka A. 2015. Chlorophyll b degradation by chlorophyll b reductase under high-light conditions. Photosynthesis Research, 126 (2):249-259.
doi: 10.1007/s11120-015-0145-6 URL |
[34] | Schäffer A A, Aravind L, Madden T L, Shavirin S, Spouge J L, Wolf Y I, Koonin E V, Altschul S F. 2001. Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Research, 29 (14):2994-3005. |
[35] | Shen Bo, Zhuang Jie-yun, Zhang Ke-qin, Dai Wei-min, Lu Ye,Fu Li-qing,Ding Jia-ming,Zheng Kang-le. 2005. Analysis of interaction between QTL and environment on chlorophyll contents in rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 38 (10):1937-1943. (in Chinese) |
沈波, 庄杰云, 张克勤, 戴伟民, 鲁烨, 傅丽卿, 丁佳铭, 郑康乐. 2005. 水稻叶绿素含量的QTL及其与环境互作分析. 中国农业科学, 38 (10):1937-1943. | |
[36] | Shen Di, Chen Long-zheng, Lu Xiao-hua, Tao Jian-ping, Feng Gu-cheng, Liu Jie-xia, Feng Kai, Yin Lian, Ding Xu,Jia Li-li,Xu Zhi-sheng,Liu Hui-ji,Xiong Ai-sheng. 2020. Resource evaluation of 29 celery varieties for autumn-winter cultivation in southern Jiangsu. Acta Agricultural Zhejangensis, 32 (4):653-660. (in Chinese) |
沈迪, 陈龙正, 路晓华, 陶建平, 冯顾城, 刘洁霞, 冯凯, 尹莲, 丁旭, 贾丽丽, 徐志胜, 刘惠吉, 熊爱生. 2020. 苏南地区29个秋冬茬芹菜品种资源评价. 浙江农业学报, 32 (4):653-660.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.04.12 |
|
[37] | Sousa F L, Liat S G, Allen J F, Martin W F. 2012. Chlorophyll biosynthesis gene evolution indicates photosystem gene duplication,not photosystem merger,at the origin of oxygenic photosynthesis. Genome Biology & Evolution, 5 (1):200-216. |
[38] | Sun Na, Wei Min, Li Yan,Wang Xiu-feng,Yang Feng-juan,Shi Qing-hua. 2016. Effects of light quality on carbon and nitrogen metabolism and enzyme activities in tomato seedlings. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 43 (1):80-88. (in Chinese) |
孙娜, 魏珉, 李岩, 王秀峰, 杨凤娟, 史庆华. 2016. 光质对番茄幼苗碳氮代谢及相关酶活性的影响. 园艺学报, 43 (1):80-88. | |
[39] |
Tewari A K, Tripathy B C. 1998. Temperature-stress-induced impairment of chlorophyll biosynthetic reactions in cucumber and wheat. Plant Physiology, 117 (3):851-858.
pmid: 9662527 |
[40] | Wang Xue-kui, Huang Jian-liang. 2015. Experimental principles and techniques of plant physiology and biochemistry. Beijing:Higher Education Press:171-173. (in Chinese) |
王学奎, 黄见良. 2015. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术. 北京:高等教育出版社:171-173. | |
[41] | Wang Ying, Wei Ling-xia, Hong Xiao, Huang Ying-jin, Wang Zhao-hai. 2018. Effect of mutation of rice magnesium protoporphyrin Ⅸ methyltransferase on photosystem Ⅱ. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 32 (10):1880-1888. (in Chinese) |
王颖, 魏玲霞, 洪潇, 黄英金, 王兆海. 2018. 水稻镁原卟啉Ⅸ甲基转移酶突变对光系统Ⅱ的影响. 核农学报, 32 (10):1880-1888.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.10.1880 |
|
[42] |
Wang Z, Hong X, Hu K, Wang Y, Wang X, Du S, Li Y, Hu D, Cheng K, An B, Li Y. 2017. Impaired magnesium protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase (ChlM)impedes chlorophyll synthesis and plant growth in rice. Frontiers in plant science, 8:1694.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01694 URL |
[43] | Yang Ni,Wan Qiwen,Li Yimin,Han Miaohua,Teng Ruimin,Liu Jiexia,Zhuang Jing. 2022. Effects of exogenous spermidine on photosynthetic characteristics and gene expression of key enzymes under salt stress in tea plant. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 49 (2):378-394. (in Chinese) |
杨妮, 万绮雯, 李逸民, 韩妙华, 滕瑞敏, 刘洁霞, 庄静. 2022. 外源亚精胺对盐胁迫下茶树光合特性及关键酶基因表达的影响. 园艺学报, 49 (2):378-394. | |
[44] | You Xiao-hui, Yang Bing-jie, Ma Yu-lei, Li Xiao-yuan, Pan Hui-tang. 2012. Seed sterilization and aseptic seeding of Primula maximowiczii. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Natural Science), 43 (2):174-178. (in Chinese) |
游晓会, 杨冰洁, 马玉磊, 李小远, 潘会堂. 2012. 胭脂花(Primula maximowiczii)种子消毒及无菌播种的研究. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 43 (2):174-178. | |
[45] | Yu Xiao-jun, Xiao Hong, Xu Chang-lin, Jing Yuan-yuan, Chai Cheng-yan. 2015. Comparative study on drought resistance and salt tolerance of Medicago ruthenica and Medicago varia at seed germination period. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 16 (2):405-410. (in Chinese) |
鱼小军, 肖红, 徐长林, 景媛媛, 柴成燕. 2015. 扁蓿豆和苜蓿种子萌发期抗旱性和耐盐性比较. 植物遗传资源学报, 16 (2):405-410. | |
[46] |
Yuan L, Zhang L, Wu Y, Zheng Y, Nie L, Zhang S, Lan T, Zhao Y, Zhu S, Hou J, Chen G, Tang X, Wang C. 2021. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals that chlorophyll metabolism contributes to leaf color changes in wucai(Brassica campestris L.)in response to cold. BMC Plant Biology, 21 (1):438.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03218-9 URL |
[1] | 贾亚敏, 徐浩, 胡文朗, 王玉雯, 叶欣, 陈立松, 李延, 郭九信. 缺镁对柑橘苗铁的吸收及亚细胞分布和化学形态的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(5): 973-983. |
[2] | 梁晨, 孙如意, 向锐, 孙艺萌, 师校欣, 杜国强, 王莉. 葡萄生长调控因子GRF家族基因的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(5): 995-1007. |
[3] | 陈思嘉, 王焕, 李蕊蕊, 王卓异, 罗靖, 王彩云. 菊花CmMYC2在舌状花绿色性状形成过程中的功能研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(11): 2377-2387. |
[4] | 李悦雅, 何栋, 陈简村, 李博, 白梦, 罗乐, 张启翔. 尖萼报春苣苔叶斑的观察与分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(11): 2388-2394. |
[5] | 齐振宇, 王婷, 桑康琪, 刘玥, 王明钦, 喻景权, 周艳虹, 夏晓剑. 设施番茄不同叶位补光对植株形态、光合及激素合成的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(8): 1504-1516. |
[6] | 弭宝彬, 谢玲玲, 肖伟, 戴雄泽, 张竹青, 汪端华, 周火强. 冬瓜果实与种子性状的遗传规律及单果质量通径分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(12): 2414-2426. |
[7] | 李恺, 张丽丽, 邵长勇, 仲崇山, 曹逼力, 史庆华, 巩彪. 亚高温下冷等离子体处理番茄种子对幼苗生长和光能利用的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(11): 2286-2298. |
[8] | 刘明秀, 王泓丁, 张宇娜, 张帮燕, 刘松, 李韵佳, 党江波, 何桥, 梁国鲁, 郭启高. 三倍体枇杷与其四倍体和二倍体亲本光系统活性差异[J]. 园艺学报, 2021, 48(1): 37-48. |
[9] | 石冬梅, 李守科, 郭先锋, 强 薇, 臧德奎, 王 利, 朱亮庆, 孟凡志, .
文冠果新品种‘开口笑’
[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(S2): 3117-3118. |
[10] | 李艳美1,刘大军2,*,冯国军2,刘 畅2,杨晓旭2,范有君2,闫志山2. 菜豆金黄荚色产生的生化机制研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(4): 749-758. |
[11] | 陈 瑶 1,2,周寒梅 1何 兵 1,*,李 维 1. GA3 和 IAA 组合调控华重楼种子萌发机理初探[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(2): 321-333. |
[12] | 刘富中, 张 映, 杨锦坤, 陈钰辉, 舒金帅, 李淑培, 陈露露. 茄子叶色黄化突变体的特征及遗传分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(12): 2340-2348. |
[13] | 闫 闻, 王喜庆, 贾云鹤, 付永凯, 尤海波. 西瓜小粒种子突变体表型与遗传规律分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(11): 2161-2168. |
[14] | 刘 范, 田 娜, 孙雪丽, 刘嘉鹏, 伍俊为, 黄玉吉, 程春振. 香蕉GLP基因家族全基因组鉴定及表达分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(10): 1930-1946. |
[15] | 金 宁,吕 剑*,郁继华*,颉建明,金 莉,张国斌,冯 致. 外源硅对PEG渗透胁迫下黄瓜种子萌发及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(1): 41-52. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司