园艺学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (7): 1519-1531.doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0438
收稿日期:
2021-12-18
修回日期:
2022-01-12
出版日期:
2022-07-25
发布日期:
2022-07-29
通讯作者:
顾沛雯
E-mail:gupeiwen2013@126.com
基金资助:
CHEN Sijie, ZHANG Tao, JIA Baosen, DU Juan, YAN Siyuan, GU Peiwen()
Received:
2021-12-18
Revised:
2022-01-12
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-07-29
Contact:
GU Peiwen
E-mail:gupeiwen2013@126.com
摘要:
通过组织分离法从‘宁杞5号’枸杞健康根筛选出深色有隔内生真菌(DSE)菌株,采用两点对峙法、菌丝生长速率法、孢子萌发法和盆栽试验探究其对枸杞根腐病菌(Fusarium oxysporum)的抑菌活性,为枸杞根腐病的生物防治提供潜在的资源菌。结果表明,8株DSE菌株均可定殖于枸杞根部,形成典型的DSE结构,且对枸杞根腐病菌有明显的抑制作用;其中菌株S12(Cladosporium cladosporioides)对病菌菌丝生长的抑制率最高,为81.47%;8株DSE菌株发酵滤液和挥发物质对枸杞根腐病菌的生长均有一定抑制作用,其中菌株S12发酵滤液浓度为10%时对病菌菌丝生长的抑制率最高,达78.43%;菌株M1(Alternaria alternata)发酵滤液浓度为50%时对病菌分生孢子萌发抑制率最高,为91.48%;菌株M1产生的挥发物质对病菌菌丝生长的抑制率最高,达94.10%。盆栽试验中,菌株M1和S12均表现出较好的生防效果,防效分别达89.54%和83.17%,优于50%多菌灵湿性粉剂500倍液处理。本结果表明DSE菌株M1和S12可有效防治枸杞根腐病,具有良好的生防潜力和应用前景。
中图分类号:
陈思杰, 张涛, 贾宝森, 杜娟, 闫思远, 顾沛雯. 深色有隔内生真菌对枸杞根腐病菌抑菌活性[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(7): 1519-1531.
CHEN Sijie, ZHANG Tao, JIA Baosen, DU Juan, YAN Siyuan, GU Peiwen. Study on Antibacterial Activity of Dark Septate Endophytes Against Fusarium oxysporum in Chinese Wolfberry[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(7): 1519-1531.
图1 DSE菌株在枸杞根部侵染定殖的观察(回接试验)h:DSE菌丝;m:DSE微菌核。
Fig. 1 Observation of DSE strain infecting and colonizing the roots of Chinese wolfberry(inoculation test)h:DSE hyphae;m:DSE microsclerotia.
图2 DSE菌株(M1、U22、U5、H4、S7、U12、U6、S12)与枸杞根腐病菌(F)皿内对峙试验A:同时接种DSE菌株与枸杞根腐病菌;B:接种DSE菌株,3 d后再接种枸杞根腐病菌。
Fig. 2 The plate confrontation test of DSE strains(M1,U22,U5,H4,S7,U12,U6,S12)against Fusarium oxysporum(F)A:Simultaneous inoculation of DSE and F. oxysporum;B:Inoculate DSE priority then inoculate the F. oxysporum after 3 days.
DSE | 同时接菌 Simultaneous inoculation | 先接种DSE菌株,3 d后接种根腐病菌 Inoculate DSE priority then inoculate the F. oxysporum after 3 days |
---|---|---|
U5 | 33.40 ± 0.31 h | 59.70 ± 0.25 e |
U6 | 29.99 ± 0.25 g | 56.56 ± 0.33 f |
U12 | 47.13 ± 0.32 c | 79.38 ± 0.31 b |
U22 | 41.52 ± 0.39 f | 60.28 ± 0.28 e |
S7 | 44.41 ± 0.30 e | 62.58 ± 0.17 d |
S12 | 54.72 ± 0.28 a | 81.47 ± 0.31 a |
M1 | 45.60 ± 0.35 d | 76.27 ± 0.23 c |
H4 | 48.16 ± 0.16 b | 80.71 ± 0.29 a |
表1 DSE菌株对枸杞根腐病菌的抑制率
Table 1 Inhibitory rate of DSE in Chinese wolfberry on mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum %
DSE | 同时接菌 Simultaneous inoculation | 先接种DSE菌株,3 d后接种根腐病菌 Inoculate DSE priority then inoculate the F. oxysporum after 3 days |
---|---|---|
U5 | 33.40 ± 0.31 h | 59.70 ± 0.25 e |
U6 | 29.99 ± 0.25 g | 56.56 ± 0.33 f |
U12 | 47.13 ± 0.32 c | 79.38 ± 0.31 b |
U22 | 41.52 ± 0.39 f | 60.28 ± 0.28 e |
S7 | 44.41 ± 0.30 e | 62.58 ± 0.17 d |
S12 | 54.72 ± 0.28 a | 81.47 ± 0.31 a |
M1 | 45.60 ± 0.35 d | 76.27 ± 0.23 c |
H4 | 48.16 ± 0.16 b | 80.71 ± 0.29 a |
图3 DSE菌株(U5、U6、U12、U22、S7、S12、M1、H4)发酵滤液对枸杞根腐病菌菌丝的抑制作用a ~ d表示菌株发酵滤液的体积分数分别为5%、10%、15%、20%,e表示空白对照。
Fig. 3 Inhibitory effect of DSE strains(U5,U6,U12,U22,S7,S12,M1,H4)culture filtrate on mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporuma-d indicates that the volume fraction of culture filtrate of strain is 5%,10%,15% and 20% respectively,and e indicates blank control.
DSE | DSE发酵滤液浓度/% DSE culture filtrate concentration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | |
U5 | 46.85 ± 0.08 e | 55.54 ± 0.15 f | 56.49 ± 0.17 f | 54.50 ± 0.18 e |
U6 | 43.57 ± 0.79 g | 53.47 ± 0.21 g | 49.46 ± 0.16 g | 45.40 ± 0.21 g |
U12 | 50.24 ± 0.04 c | 68.63 ± 0.13 d | 60.63 ± 0.19 d | 57.44 ± 0.08 d |
U22 | 45.55 ± 0.23 f | 63.53 ± 0.17 e | 56.70 ± 0.21 f | 52.43 ± 0.20 f |
S7 | 45.80 ± 0.18 f | 53.49 ± 0.19 g | 59.61 ± 0.15 e | 57.82 ± 0.49 d |
S12 | 55.24 ± 0.20 a | 78.43 ± 0.04 a | 64.56 ± 0.17 c | 62.62 ± 0.18 b |
M1 | 51.35 ± 0.24 b | 75.63 ± 0.09 b | 66.78 ± 0.03 b | 64.58 ± 0.16 a |
H4 | 49.86 ± 0.08 d | 73.45 ± 0.14 c | 69.17 ± 0.09 a | 61.25 ± 0.12 c |
表2 DSE菌株发酵滤液对枸杞根腐病菌菌丝的抑制率
Table 2 Inhibitory rate of DSE culture filtrate on mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum in Chinese wolfberry %
DSE | DSE发酵滤液浓度/% DSE culture filtrate concentration | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | |
U5 | 46.85 ± 0.08 e | 55.54 ± 0.15 f | 56.49 ± 0.17 f | 54.50 ± 0.18 e |
U6 | 43.57 ± 0.79 g | 53.47 ± 0.21 g | 49.46 ± 0.16 g | 45.40 ± 0.21 g |
U12 | 50.24 ± 0.04 c | 68.63 ± 0.13 d | 60.63 ± 0.19 d | 57.44 ± 0.08 d |
U22 | 45.55 ± 0.23 f | 63.53 ± 0.17 e | 56.70 ± 0.21 f | 52.43 ± 0.20 f |
S7 | 45.80 ± 0.18 f | 53.49 ± 0.19 g | 59.61 ± 0.15 e | 57.82 ± 0.49 d |
S12 | 55.24 ± 0.20 a | 78.43 ± 0.04 a | 64.56 ± 0.17 c | 62.62 ± 0.18 b |
M1 | 51.35 ± 0.24 b | 75.63 ± 0.09 b | 66.78 ± 0.03 b | 64.58 ± 0.16 a |
H4 | 49.86 ± 0.08 d | 73.45 ± 0.14 c | 69.17 ± 0.09 a | 61.25 ± 0.12 c |
菌株 Strain | 发酵滤液浓度/% DSE culture filtrate concentration | 萌发率/% Germination rate | 抑制率/% Inhibition rate | 菌株 Strain | 发酵滤液浓度/% DSE culture filtrate concentration | 萌发率/% Germination rate | 抑制率/% Inhibition rate | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U5 | 对照Control | 78.97 ± 0.26 a | — | S7 | 对照Control | 83.53 ± 0.07 a | — | |
10 | 58.00 ± 0.25 b | 26.55 ± 0.24 E | 10 | 53.75 ± 0.07 b | 35.65 ± 0.09 E | |||
20 | 50.98 ± 0.25 c | 35.44 ± 0.19 D | 20 | 38.76 ± 0.18 c | 53.60 ± 0.19 D | |||
30 | 45.25 ± 0.21 c | 42.70 ± 0.10 C | 30 | 29.71 ± 0.07 d | 64.43 ± 0.10 C | |||
40 | 28.01 ± 0.18 d | 64.53 ± 0.20 B | 40 | 22.20 ± 0.24 d | 73.42 ± 0.27 B | |||
50 | 23.34 ± 0.17 d | 70.45 ± 0.11 A | 50 | 16.26 ± 0.17 d | 80.54 ± 0.19 A | |||
U6 | 对照Control | 80.50 ± 0.18 a | — | S12 | 对照Control | 84.48 ± 0.07 a | — | |
10 | 61.42 ± 0.14 b | 23.69 ± 0.07 D | 10 | 42.65 ± 0.17 b | 49.51 ± 0.21 D | |||
20 | 45.57 ± 0.22 c | 43.39 ± 0.22 C | 20 | 34.99 ± 0.17 c | 58.58 ± 0.19 C | |||
30 | 36.01 ± 0.08 d | 55.27 ± 0.08 B | 30 | 28.12 ± 0.14 d | 66.71 ± 0.17 B | |||
40 | 32.62 ± 0.19 d | 59.48 ± 0.16 B | 40 | 13.13 ± 0.09 e | 84.45 ± 0.09 A | |||
50 | 25.29 ± 0.10 e | 68.59 ± 0.18 A | 50 | 9.08 ± 0.14 e | 89.26 ± 0.16 A | |||
U12 | 对照Control | 79.57 ± 0.18 a | — | M1 | 对照Control | 83.12 ± 0.14 a | — | |
10 | 55.39 ± 0.15 b | 30.39 ± 0.10 E | 10 | 37.69 ± 0.19 b | 54.66 ± 0.15 E | |||
20 | 40.99 ± 0.05 b | 48.48 ± 0.06 D | 20 | 26.16 ± 0.09 c | 68.53 ± 0.16 D | |||
30 | 31.55 ± 0.23 c | 60.36 ± 0.21 C | 30 | 17.03 ± 0.05 d | 79.51 ± 0.08 C | |||
40 | 22.70 ± 0.06 d | 71.47 ± 0.03 B | 40 | 11.19 ± 0.09 e | 86.54 ± 0.13 B | |||
50 | 14.13 ± 0.08 e | 82.24 ± 0.13 A | 50 | 7.08 ± 0.06 e | 91.48 ± 0.07 A | |||
U22 | 对照Control | 80.44 ± 0.10 a | — | H4 | 对照Control | 82.35 ± 0.14 a | — | |
10 | 59.83 ± 0.17 b | 25.63 ± 0.21 C | 10 | 43.96 ± 0.16 b | 46.62 ± 0.21 D | |||
20 | 53.49 ± 0.16 b | 33.51 ± 0.12 C | 20 | 29.93 ± 0.14 c | 63.65 ± 0.16 C | |||
30 | 46.37 ± 0.04 c | 42.70 ± 0.15 B | 30 | 24.29 ± 0.19 c | 70.50 ± 0.24 B | |||
40 | 35.06 ± 0.24 d | 56.42 ± 0.25 A | 40 | 17.07 ± 0.10 d | 79.27 ± 0.12 A | |||
50 | 27.74 ± 0.14 d | 65.52 ± 0.22 A | 50 | 11.94 ± 0.15 d | 85.50 ± 0.17 A |
表3 DSE菌株发酵滤液对枸杞根腐病菌分生孢子萌发的抑制作用
Table 3 Inhibitory effects of DSE culture filtrate on conidial germination of Fusarium oxysporum in Chinese wolfberry
菌株 Strain | 发酵滤液浓度/% DSE culture filtrate concentration | 萌发率/% Germination rate | 抑制率/% Inhibition rate | 菌株 Strain | 发酵滤液浓度/% DSE culture filtrate concentration | 萌发率/% Germination rate | 抑制率/% Inhibition rate | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U5 | 对照Control | 78.97 ± 0.26 a | — | S7 | 对照Control | 83.53 ± 0.07 a | — | |
10 | 58.00 ± 0.25 b | 26.55 ± 0.24 E | 10 | 53.75 ± 0.07 b | 35.65 ± 0.09 E | |||
20 | 50.98 ± 0.25 c | 35.44 ± 0.19 D | 20 | 38.76 ± 0.18 c | 53.60 ± 0.19 D | |||
30 | 45.25 ± 0.21 c | 42.70 ± 0.10 C | 30 | 29.71 ± 0.07 d | 64.43 ± 0.10 C | |||
40 | 28.01 ± 0.18 d | 64.53 ± 0.20 B | 40 | 22.20 ± 0.24 d | 73.42 ± 0.27 B | |||
50 | 23.34 ± 0.17 d | 70.45 ± 0.11 A | 50 | 16.26 ± 0.17 d | 80.54 ± 0.19 A | |||
U6 | 对照Control | 80.50 ± 0.18 a | — | S12 | 对照Control | 84.48 ± 0.07 a | — | |
10 | 61.42 ± 0.14 b | 23.69 ± 0.07 D | 10 | 42.65 ± 0.17 b | 49.51 ± 0.21 D | |||
20 | 45.57 ± 0.22 c | 43.39 ± 0.22 C | 20 | 34.99 ± 0.17 c | 58.58 ± 0.19 C | |||
30 | 36.01 ± 0.08 d | 55.27 ± 0.08 B | 30 | 28.12 ± 0.14 d | 66.71 ± 0.17 B | |||
40 | 32.62 ± 0.19 d | 59.48 ± 0.16 B | 40 | 13.13 ± 0.09 e | 84.45 ± 0.09 A | |||
50 | 25.29 ± 0.10 e | 68.59 ± 0.18 A | 50 | 9.08 ± 0.14 e | 89.26 ± 0.16 A | |||
U12 | 对照Control | 79.57 ± 0.18 a | — | M1 | 对照Control | 83.12 ± 0.14 a | — | |
10 | 55.39 ± 0.15 b | 30.39 ± 0.10 E | 10 | 37.69 ± 0.19 b | 54.66 ± 0.15 E | |||
20 | 40.99 ± 0.05 b | 48.48 ± 0.06 D | 20 | 26.16 ± 0.09 c | 68.53 ± 0.16 D | |||
30 | 31.55 ± 0.23 c | 60.36 ± 0.21 C | 30 | 17.03 ± 0.05 d | 79.51 ± 0.08 C | |||
40 | 22.70 ± 0.06 d | 71.47 ± 0.03 B | 40 | 11.19 ± 0.09 e | 86.54 ± 0.13 B | |||
50 | 14.13 ± 0.08 e | 82.24 ± 0.13 A | 50 | 7.08 ± 0.06 e | 91.48 ± 0.07 A | |||
U22 | 对照Control | 80.44 ± 0.10 a | — | H4 | 对照Control | 82.35 ± 0.14 a | — | |
10 | 59.83 ± 0.17 b | 25.63 ± 0.21 C | 10 | 43.96 ± 0.16 b | 46.62 ± 0.21 D | |||
20 | 53.49 ± 0.16 b | 33.51 ± 0.12 C | 20 | 29.93 ± 0.14 c | 63.65 ± 0.16 C | |||
30 | 46.37 ± 0.04 c | 42.70 ± 0.15 B | 30 | 24.29 ± 0.19 c | 70.50 ± 0.24 B | |||
40 | 35.06 ± 0.24 d | 56.42 ± 0.25 A | 40 | 17.07 ± 0.10 d | 79.27 ± 0.12 A | |||
50 | 27.74 ± 0.14 d | 65.52 ± 0.22 A | 50 | 11.94 ± 0.15 d | 85.50 ± 0.17 A |
DSE | DSE预先接种天数 DSE pre-inoculation days | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |
U5 | 45.13 ± 0.09 d | 54.22 ± 0.22 g | 64.26 ± 0.15 g | 50.32 ± 0.29 g | 49.59 ± 0.21 c | 21.51 ± 0.27 g |
U6 | 43.81 ± 0.19 e | 59.07 ± 0.13 f | 63.01 ± 0.46 h | 51.37 ± 0.29 f | 42.33 ± 0.08 f | 23.29 ± 0.25 f |
U12 | 69.42 ± 0.19 c | 72.62 ± 0.24 e | 86.95 ± 0.23 a | 65.36 ± 0.23 b | 44.07 ± 0.18 e | 25.30 ± 0.44 e |
U22 | 52.37 ± 0.22 d | 82.38 ± 0.23 d | 67.14 ± 0.13 f | 63.16 ± 0.13 d | 54.41 ± 0.46 b | 31.47 ± 0.30 d |
S7 | 42.09 ± 0.89 f | 52.13 ± 0.56 h | 73.67 ± 0.25 d | 54.03 ± 0.44 e | 48.62 ± 0.30 d | 34.59 ± 0.26 c |
S12 | 89.25 ± 0.46 a | 92.15 ± 0.10 b | 78.07 ± 0.13 b | 64.28 ± 0.21 c | 54.11 ± 0.46 b | 37.29 ± 0.36 a |
M1 | 88.58 ± 0.23 a | 94.10 ± 0.22 a | 71.40 ± 0.23 e | 65.52 ± 0.26 b | 55.59 ± 0.23 a | 37.78 ± 0.33 a |
H4 | 82.79 ± 0.22 b | 90.16 ± 0.11 c | 76.29 ± 0.29 c | 67.26 ± 0.36 a | 49.10 ± 0.10 cd | 36.22 ± 0.25 b |
表4 DSE菌株挥发物质对枸杞根腐病菌的抑制率
Table 4 Inhibitory rate of the volatile compounds produced by DSE on mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum in Chinese wolfberry %
DSE | DSE预先接种天数 DSE pre-inoculation days | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |
U5 | 45.13 ± 0.09 d | 54.22 ± 0.22 g | 64.26 ± 0.15 g | 50.32 ± 0.29 g | 49.59 ± 0.21 c | 21.51 ± 0.27 g |
U6 | 43.81 ± 0.19 e | 59.07 ± 0.13 f | 63.01 ± 0.46 h | 51.37 ± 0.29 f | 42.33 ± 0.08 f | 23.29 ± 0.25 f |
U12 | 69.42 ± 0.19 c | 72.62 ± 0.24 e | 86.95 ± 0.23 a | 65.36 ± 0.23 b | 44.07 ± 0.18 e | 25.30 ± 0.44 e |
U22 | 52.37 ± 0.22 d | 82.38 ± 0.23 d | 67.14 ± 0.13 f | 63.16 ± 0.13 d | 54.41 ± 0.46 b | 31.47 ± 0.30 d |
S7 | 42.09 ± 0.89 f | 52.13 ± 0.56 h | 73.67 ± 0.25 d | 54.03 ± 0.44 e | 48.62 ± 0.30 d | 34.59 ± 0.26 c |
S12 | 89.25 ± 0.46 a | 92.15 ± 0.10 b | 78.07 ± 0.13 b | 64.28 ± 0.21 c | 54.11 ± 0.46 b | 37.29 ± 0.36 a |
M1 | 88.58 ± 0.23 a | 94.10 ± 0.22 a | 71.40 ± 0.23 e | 65.52 ± 0.26 b | 55.59 ± 0.23 a | 37.78 ± 0.33 a |
H4 | 82.79 ± 0.22 b | 90.16 ± 0.11 c | 76.29 ± 0.29 c | 67.26 ± 0.36 a | 49.10 ± 0.10 cd | 36.22 ± 0.25 b |
图4 DSE菌株(U5、U6、U12、U22、S7、S12、M1、H4)挥发物质对枸杞根腐病菌菌丝的抑制0、2、4、6、8、10表示预先接种DSE菌株的天数,CK代表空白对照。
Fig. 4 Inhibitory effect of the volatile compounds produced by DSE strains(U5,U6,U12,U22,S7,S12,M1,H4) on mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum0,2,4,6,8 and 10 indicates days of pre-inoculation with DSE strains,and CK indicates the blank control.
DSE | 同时接种 Simultaneous inoculation | 7 d后接枸杞根腐病菌 Inoculation of Fusarium oxysporum after 7 days | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数/% Disease index | 防效/% Inhibition rates | 病情指数/% Disease index | 防效/% inhibition rates | |
CK | 100.00 ± 0 a | — | 97.39 ± 3.97 a | — |
U5 | 37.60 ± 0.26 b | 42.54 ± 2.53 g | 34.07 ± 1.99 b | 44.95 ± 1.58 h |
U6 | 29.89 ± 0.35 c | 51.87 ± 2.06 e | 28.69 ± 1.00 c | 53.49 ± 1.90 f |
U12 | 28.60 ± 0.93 d | 47.67 ± 1.41 f | 26.24 ± 2.10 d | 51.96 ± 2.15 g |
U22 | 29.18 ± 0.74 c | 63.41 ± 4.13 d | 26.64 ± 1.95 d | 65.87 ± 1.67 e |
S7 | 27.83 ± 4.37 d | 64.61 ± 7.86 d | 19.15 ± 6.60 e | 77.66 ± 5.12 d |
S12 | 23.95 ± 1.74 e | 72.57 ± 1.71 b | 14.98 ± 1.88 g | 83.17 ± 1.29 b |
M1 | 19.60 ± 0.26 g | 78.22 ± 1.92 a | 12.07 ± 1.99 h | 89.54 ± 1.78 a |
H4 | 24.48 ± 0.26 e | 69.33 ± 2.15 c | 16.26 ± 0.41 f | 79.33 ± 2.15 c |
多菌灵 Carbendazim | 22.25 ± 1.13 f | 71.83 ± 1.65 b | 14.12 ± 2.78 g | 82.36 ± 2.67 b |
表5 DSE菌株发酵滤液对枸杞幼苗根腐病的生防效果
Table 5 Biocontrol effect of DSE culture filtrate on root rot of seedlings of Chinese wolfberry
DSE | 同时接种 Simultaneous inoculation | 7 d后接枸杞根腐病菌 Inoculation of Fusarium oxysporum after 7 days | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
病情指数/% Disease index | 防效/% Inhibition rates | 病情指数/% Disease index | 防效/% inhibition rates | |
CK | 100.00 ± 0 a | — | 97.39 ± 3.97 a | — |
U5 | 37.60 ± 0.26 b | 42.54 ± 2.53 g | 34.07 ± 1.99 b | 44.95 ± 1.58 h |
U6 | 29.89 ± 0.35 c | 51.87 ± 2.06 e | 28.69 ± 1.00 c | 53.49 ± 1.90 f |
U12 | 28.60 ± 0.93 d | 47.67 ± 1.41 f | 26.24 ± 2.10 d | 51.96 ± 2.15 g |
U22 | 29.18 ± 0.74 c | 63.41 ± 4.13 d | 26.64 ± 1.95 d | 65.87 ± 1.67 e |
S7 | 27.83 ± 4.37 d | 64.61 ± 7.86 d | 19.15 ± 6.60 e | 77.66 ± 5.12 d |
S12 | 23.95 ± 1.74 e | 72.57 ± 1.71 b | 14.98 ± 1.88 g | 83.17 ± 1.29 b |
M1 | 19.60 ± 0.26 g | 78.22 ± 1.92 a | 12.07 ± 1.99 h | 89.54 ± 1.78 a |
H4 | 24.48 ± 0.26 e | 69.33 ± 2.15 c | 16.26 ± 0.41 f | 79.33 ± 2.15 c |
多菌灵 Carbendazim | 22.25 ± 1.13 f | 71.83 ± 1.65 b | 14.12 ± 2.78 g | 82.36 ± 2.67 b |
[1] |
Ban Y, Tang M, Chen H, Xu Z, Zhang H, Yang Y. 2012. The response of dark septate endophytes(DSE)to heavy metals in pure culture. PLoS ONE, 7 (10):e47968.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047968 URL |
[2] |
Challacombe J F, Hesse C N, Bramer L M, McCue L A, Lipton M, Purvine S, Nicora C, Gallegos-Graves V, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske C R. 2019. Genomes and secretomes of ascomycota fungi reveal diverse functions in plant biomass decomposition and pathogenesis. BMC Genomics, 20 (7):291-315.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5656-7 URL |
[3] | Chauhan A, Ranjan A, Jindal T. 2018. Biological control agents for sustainable agriculture,safe water and soil health//Jindal T.Paradigms in Pollution Prevention. Springer Cham:71-83. |
[4] | Chen Ling-li. 2015. Biological characteristics of pathogens causing wolf berry root rot and fungicides controlling experiment[M. D. Dissertation]. Xining: Qinghai University. (in Chinese) |
陈伶俐. 2015. 柴达木地区枸杞根腐病病原菌生物学特性及药剂防治研究[硕士论文]. 西宁: 青海大学. | |
[5] | Cheng J, Zhou Z W, Sheng H P, He L J, Fan X, He Z, Sun T, Zhang X, Zhao R J, Gu L, Cao C, Zhou S. 2015. An evidence-based update on the pharmacological activities and possible molecular targets of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides. Drug Design,Development and Therapy, 9:33-78. |
[6] | Dai Meng-xue, Zhang Guang-qun, Fan Xu-miao, Li Bo, Zhan Fang-dong, He Yong-mei. 2020. Research progress regarding the ecological distribution and function of dark septate endophytes in stressful environments. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 26 (3):722-729. (in Chinese) |
代梦雪, 张光群, 范旭杪, 李博, 湛方栋, 何永美. 2020. 胁迫生境深色有隔内生真菌生态分布与功能研究进展. 应用与环境生物学报, 26 (3):722-729. | |
[7] |
Deng X, Song X S, Halifu S, Wenjing Y, Ruiqing S. 2020. Effects of dark septateendophytes strain A 024 on damping-off biocontrol,plant growth and the rhizosphere soil enviroment of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica annual seedlings. Plants, 9 (7):913.
doi: 10.3390/plants9070913 URL |
[8] |
Diene O, Wang W, Narisawa K. 2013. Pseudosigmoidea ibarakiensis sp. nov.,a dark septate endophytic fungus from a cedar forest in Ibaraki,Japan. Microbes and Environments, 28 (3):381-387.
doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13002 URL |
[9] | Fu Bo, Wang Jia-zhe, Zhang Feng, Li Ying-mei, Ren Ping. 2019. Screening and identification of broad spectrum antagonistic strains against pathogenic bacteria of kiwifruit leaf blight. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 65 (10):22-26. (in Chinese) |
付博, 王家哲, 张锋, 李英梅, 任平. 2019. 猕猴桃叶枯病病原菌广谱拮抗菌株的筛选与鉴定. 陕西农业科学, 65 (10):22-26. | |
[10] |
Gao Fen, Ren Xiao-xia, Wang Meng-liang, Qin Xue-mei. 2015. Research progress in root rot diseases of Chinese herbal medicine and control strategy by antagonistic microorganisms. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 40 (21):4122-4126. (in Chinese)
pmid: 27071243 |
高芬, 任小霞, 王梦亮, 秦雪梅. 2015. 中草药根腐病及其微生物防治研究进展. 中国中药杂志, 40 (21):4122-4126.
pmid: 27071243 |
|
[11] | Gond S K, Verma V C, Mishra A, Kumar A R K. 2010. Role of fungal endophytes in plant protection. Management of Fungal Plant Pathogens. UK:CAB International. |
[12] | Grünig C R, Queloz V, Sieber T N. 2011. Structure of diversity in dark septate endophytes: from species to genes. Springer:3-30. |
[13] |
Harsonowati W, Marian M, Surono, Narisawa K. 2020. The effectiveness of a dark septate endophytic fungus,Cladophialophora chaetospira SK51,to mitigate strawberry fusarium wilt disease and with growth promotion activities. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11:585.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00585 pmid: 32351466 |
[14] |
He C, Wang W, Hou J. 2019. Plant growth and soil microbial impacts of enhancing licorice with inoculating dark septate endophytes under drought stress. Front Microbiol, 10:2277.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02277 URL |
[15] | Hu Li-jie, Yan Si-yuan, Li Jia-hong, Du Juan, Gu Pei-wen. 2020. Antagonism and control potential of endophytic fungi from Lycium barbarum against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Plant Protection, 46 (1):125-133. (in Chinese) |
胡丽杰, 闫思远, 李嘉泓, 杜娟, 顾沛雯. 2020. 枸杞内生真菌对胶孢炭疽菌Colletotrichum gloeosporioides的拮抗作用及生防潜力. 植物保护, 46 (1):125-133. | |
[16] | Hu Li-jie, Yan Si-yuan, Sun Mu-di, Li Wen-xue, Gu Pei-wen. 2019. Infection characteristics and diversity of dark septate endophytic fungi isolated from Lycium barbarum in Ningxia. Microbiology China, 46 (11):2973-2984. (in Chinese) |
胡丽杰, 闫思远, 孙牧笛, 李文学, 顾沛雯. 2019. 宁夏枸杞深色有隔内生真菌的侵染特征及多样性. 微生物学通报, 46 (11):2973-2984. | |
[17] |
Khastini R O, Ogawara T, Sato Y, Narisawa K. 2014. Control of fusarium wilt in melon by the fungal endophyte,Cadophora sp. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 139 (2):339-348.
doi: 10.1007/s10658-014-0389-6 URL |
[18] | Li Jie. 2015. The root rot pathogens of Lycium bararum in Gansu province and physiological biochemical mechanism of resistance[Ph. D. Dissertation]. Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University. (in Chinese) |
李捷. 2015. 甘肃省枸杞根腐病病原及生理生化抗病机理研究[博士论文]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学. | |
[19] |
Li T, Liu M J, Zhang X T, Zhang H B, Sha T, Zhao Z W. 2011. Improved tolerance of maize(Zea mays L.)to heavy metals by colonization of a dark septate endophyte(DSE)Exophiala pisciphila. Science of the Total Environment, 409 (6):1069-1074.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.012 URL |
[20] |
Li X, He X, Hou L, Ren Y, Wang S, Su F. 2018. Dark septate endophytes isolated from a xerophyte plant promote the growth of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus under drought condition. Scientific Reports, 8 (1):7896.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26183-0 URL |
[21] | Li Xin-long, Li Yan-zhong. 2015. Research advances in biological control of soil-borne disease. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 24 (3):204-212. (in Chinese) |
李兴龙, 李彦忠. 2015. 土传病害生物防治研究进展. 草业学报, 24 (3):204-212. | |
[22] | Li Xue-juan, A Xiao-zhu, Bai Lu-chao. 2021. Isolation and identification of pathogen of Lycium barbarum root rot disease in Nuomuhong Farm. Molecular Plant Breeding, 19 (4):1232-1236. (in Chinese) |
李薛娟, 阿孝珠, 白露超. 2021. 诺木洪枸杞根腐病病原菌的分离与鉴定. 分子植物育种, 19 (4):1232-1236. | |
[23] | Lu Hai-ju, Shen Yun-mei, Tao Hong-zheng, Jiang Tao, Wang Chuan-ming. 2017. Multifunction of endophytic Trichoderma P3.9 strain and control effect on loquat root rot. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 26 (11):1681-1688. (in Chinese) |
鲁海菊, 沈云玫, 陶宏征, 江涛, 王传铭. 2017. 内生木霉P3.9菌株的多功能性及其枇杷根腐病的盆栽防效. 西北农业学报, 26 (11):1681-1688. | |
[24] | Lü Qianqian, Zhao Xinggang, Wang Dongdong, Mao Xia, Zuo Cunwu, Yang Jiangshan. 2020. Identification of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BaA-007 and its inhibitory effect on apple canker. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 47 (10):1895-1904. (in Chinese) |
吕前前, 赵兴刚, 王东东, 冒霞, 左存武, 杨江山. 2020. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌BaA-007鉴定及其对苹果腐烂病的抑制作用. 园艺学报, 47 (10):1895-1904. | |
[25] | Miao Zhi, Ma Yang-ming, Kong Yang, Xu Qian, Qu Zi-rui. 2016. Isolation and secondary metobalities antibucterial activity of J14,an endophytic fungus in Nerium indicum. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 44 (1):88-92. (in Chinese) |
苗智, 马养民, 孔阳, 许倩, 屈子睿. 2016. 夹竹桃内生真菌J14次生代谢产物的分离和抑菌活性. 贵州农业科学, 44 (1):88-92. | |
[26] | Nong Qian, Zhang Wen-Long, Lan Tao-Ju, Su Qin, Chen Yan-Lu, Zhang Yan, Qin Li-Ping, Xie Ling. 2017. Screening and identification of dark septate endophyte strain L-14 and its mechanism of banana fusarium wilt disease resistance. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 38 (3):559-564. (in Chinese) |
农倩, 张雯龙, 蓝桃菊, 苏琴, 陈艳露, 张艳, 覃丽萍, 谢玲. 2017. 一株抗香蕉枯萎病DSE菌株的筛选鉴定及抗病机理初探. 热带作物学报, 38 (3):559-564. | |
[27] |
Orlandelli R C, Vasconcelos A, Azevedo J L, Corradi D S M, Pamphile J A. 2016. Screening of endophytic sources of exopolysaccharides:preliminary characterization of crude exopolysaccharide produced by submerged culture of Diaporthe sp. JF 766998 under different cultivation time. Biochim Open, 2:33-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopen.2016.02.003 URL |
[28] |
Qin Y, Pan X, Kubicek C, Druzhinina I, Chenthamara K, Labbé J, Yuan Z. 2017. Diverse plant-associated pleosporalean fungi from saline areas:ecological tolerance and nitrogen-status dependent effects on plant growth. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8:158.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00158 pmid: 28220113 |
[29] |
Sánchez-Ortiz B L, Sánchez-Fernández R E, Duarte G, Lappe-Oliveras P, M L M. 2016. Antifungal,anti-oomycete and phytotoxic effects of volatile organic compounds from the endophytic fungus Xylaria sp. strain PB3f3 isolated from Haematoxylon brasiletto. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 120 (5):1313-1325.
doi: 10.1111/jam.13101 pmid: 26920072 |
[30] |
Shadmani L, Jamali S, Fatemi A. 2021. Isolation,identification,and characterization of cadmium-tolerant endophytic fungi isolated from barley(Hordeum vulgare L.)roots and their role in enhancing phytoremediation. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 52:1097-1106.
doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00493-4 pmid: 33871825 |
[31] |
Shaw J J, Berbasova T, Sasaki T, Jefferson-George K, Spakowicz D J, Dunican B F, Portero C E, Narvaez-Trujillo A, Strobel S A. 2015. Identification of a fungal 1,8-cineole synthase from Hypoxylon sp. with specificity determinants in common with the plant synthases. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 290 (13):8511-8526.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.636159 URL |
[32] | Song Xue-yun, Yu Jian-zhong, Xu Ming-wei. 2017. Field efficacy trials of two fungicides against wolfberry root rot. Chinese Horticulture Abstracts, 33 (7):225-226. (in Chinese) |
宋学云, 俞建中, 许明伟. 2017. 2种药剂防治枸杞根腐病田间药效试验. 中国园艺文摘, 33 (7):225-226. | |
[33] | Su Zheng-zhu, Feng Xiao-xiao, Wang Yan-xin, Liu Xiao-hong, Zhang Chu-long, Lin Fu-cheng. 2019. Biocontrol effects of falciphora oryzae resistant to rice bacterial blight. Mycosystema, 38 (6):802-810. (in Chinese) |
苏珍珠, 冯晓晓, 汪彦欣, 刘小红, 章初龙, 林福呈. 2019. 稻镰状瓶霉对水稻白叶枯病的生物防治. 菌物学报, 38 (6):802-810. | |
[34] |
Sun Qian, Xue Zi-Ke, Xie Lin-Lin, He Xue-Li, Zhao Li Li. 2017. Diversity of dark septate endophyte in the roots of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus and its companion plants. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 41 (7):729-737. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0270 |
孙茜, 薛子可, 解琳琳, 贺学礼, 赵丽莉. 2017. 沙冬青及其伴生植物深色有隔内生真菌物种多样性. 植物生态学报, 41 (7):729-737.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0270 |
|
[35] | Tang Yan, Li Min, Ma Huan-cheng, Wu Jian-rong. 2019. Mycorrhizal diversity of Rhododendron racemosum Franch. in Yunnan Jiaozi Mountain. Journal of Yunnan University(Natural Sciences Edition), 41 (5):1062-1072. (in Chinese) |
唐燕, 李敏, 马焕成, 伍建榕. 2019. 云南轿子山腋花杜鹃菌根多样性研究. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 41 (5):1062-1072. | |
[36] |
Tellenbach C, Sumarah M W, Grünig C, Miller J D. 2013. Inhibition of Phytophthora species by secondary metabolites produced by the dark septate endophyte Phialocephala europaea. Fungal Ecology, 6 (1):12-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2012.10.003 URL |
[37] |
Wang Chunwei, Wang Yan, Zhang Xiqian, Dong Tian, Wen Zhihao, Liu Qianru, Li Tianli, Wang Yihui, Wang Saifeng, Zhang Zuogang, Wang Jianming, Wang Meiqin. 2018. Isolation,identification,optimization of fermentation conditions and biocontrol effects of antagonistic bacterium strain YJ15. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 45 (10):1905-1916. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0234 URL |
王春伟, 王燕, 张曦倩, 董田, 温智浩, 刘倩茹, 李田丽, 王怡惠, 王赛风, 张作刚, 王建明, 王美琴. 2018. 拮抗细菌菌株YJ15 的分离鉴定、发酵条件优化及对越橘灰霉病的防效. 园艺学报, 45 (10):1905-1916.
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0234 URL |
|
[38] | Xie Xue-wen, Zhao Yu-rong, Sun Xue-ying, Shi Yan-xia, Chai A-li, Li Lei, Li Bao-ju. 2020. Identification and control effect of a biocontrol bacterium against phytophthora root rot of tomato. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 50 (5):610-617. (in Chinese) |
谢学文, 赵昱榕, 孙雪莹, 石延霞, 柴阿丽, 李磊, 李宝聚. 2020. 番茄疫霉根腐病生防菌的分离鉴定及其防治效果. 植物病理学报, 50 (5):610-617. | |
[39] | Xu X, He Q, Chen C, Zhang C. 2016. Differential communications between fungi and host plants revealed by secretome analysis of phylogenetically related endophytic and pathogenic fungi. PLoS ONE, 11 (9):e163368. |
[40] | Yu Jie, He Xue-li, , Su Fang. 2018. Colonization and community composition of dark endophytic fungi in Fengfeng mining area of Hebei. Journal of Fungal Research, 16 (4):228-238. (in Chinese) |
蔚杰, 贺学礼, 赵丽莉, 苏芳. 2018. 河北峰峰矿区深色有隔内生真菌定殖及群落组成. 菌物研究, 16 (4):228-238. | |
[41] | Zhang Xiao-rong, Li Tao, Wang Chao-jun, Zhu Ling-ling, Xu Lu-juan, Zhao Zhi-wei. 2017. Enhanced tolerance of tomatoes against Fusarium oxysporum by inoculation with dark septate endophyte. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 33 (3):394-400. (in Chinese) |
张晓蓉, 李涛, 王超君, 朱玲玲, 徐露娟, 赵之伟. 2017. 深色有隔内生真菌甘瓶霉对番茄抗枯萎病的作用. 中国生物防治学报, 33 (3):394-400. | |
[42] | Zhang Yun, Feng Zi-li, Feng Hong-jie, Li Zhi-fang, Shi Yong-qiang, Zhao Li-hong, Zhu He-qing, Yang Jia-rong. 2016. Control effect of endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum CEF-082 against verticillium wilt in Gossypium hirsutum. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, 46 (5):697-706. (in Chinese) |
张芸, 冯自力, 冯鸿杰, 李志芳, 师勇强, 赵丽红, 朱荷琴, 杨家荣. 2016. 内生球毛壳属真菌CEF-082对棉花黄萎病的控制作用. 植物病理学报, 46 (5):697-706. | |
[43] |
Zhao L, Xu Y, Lai X H, Shan C, Deng Z, Ji Y. 2015. Screening and characterization of endophytic Bacillus and Paenibacillus strains from medicinal plant Lonicera japonica for use as potential plant growth promoters. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 46 (4):977-989.
doi: 10.1590/S1517-838246420140024 URL |
[44] | Zhao Xin, Zhao Li-li, Wang Pu-chang, Chen Chao. 2020. Research progress of endophytic fungi and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve plant adaptability to adversity. Journal of Yunnan University(Natural Sciences Edition), 42 (3):577-591. (in Chinese) |
赵鑫, 赵丽丽, 王普昶, 陈超. 2020. 内生真菌和丛枝菌根真菌提高植物逆境适应性研究进展. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 42 (3):577-591. | |
[45] | Zhou Bing, Yan Xiao-hong, Peng Feng, Guo Nian-mei, Zhong Juan, Yin Shuai-wen. 2011. Antifungal activities of Alternaria alternata metabolites. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Natural Science Edition), 40 (4):416-420. (in Chinese) |
周兵, 闫小红, 彭峰, 郭年梅, 钟娟, 殷帅文. 2011. 链格孢菌代谢产物的抑菌活性. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 40 (4):416-420. | |
[46] |
Zhou Ying, Wu Ling-shang, Chen Qiu-yan, Sun Mei-chen, Li Cong, Si Jin-ping. 2020. Screening of endophytic fungi against southern blight disease pathogen-Sclerotium delphinii in Dendrobium catenatum. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 45 (22):5459-5464. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20200816.102 pmid: 33350206 |
周莹, 吴令上, 陈秋燕, 孙美辰, 李聪, 斯金平. 2020. 抗宿主白绢病的铁皮石斛内生真菌的筛选. 中国中药杂志, 45 (22):5459-5464.
pmid: 33350206 |
|
[47] |
Zhou Zhen-yu, Hu Jin-li, Su Xin, Liu Dong-xue, Bu Ning, Ma Lian-ju. 2017. Identification and resistance of an endophytic fungus YD 02 strain in wild Glycine soja. Biotechnology Bulletin, 33 (11):106-111. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017-0403 |
周振宇, 胡金丽, 苏昕, 刘冬雪, 卜宁, 马莲菊. 2017. 一株野大豆内生真菌YD02菌株的鉴定及抗逆性研究. 生物技术通报, 33 (11):106-111.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017-0403 |
[1] | 程庆华, 张志鹏, 吴艳萍, 万宇鹤, 陈应娟. 苦参碱对茶树炭疽菌的抑菌作用研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(2): 432-440. |
[2] | 史洪丽, 李腊, 郭翠梅, 余婷婷, 简伟, 杨星勇. 番茄灰霉病生防菌株TL1的分离、鉴定及其生防能力分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 79-90. |
[3] | 杜玉玲, 杨凡, 赵娟, 刘书琪, 龙超安. 新鱼腥草素钠对柑橘指状青霉的抑菌作用[J]. 园艺学报, 2023, 50(1): 145-152. |
[4] | 祁利潘, 李越, 王磊, 冯琰, 王宽, 尹江, 郭华春. 马铃薯与枸杞嫁接愈合过程的解剖学观察[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(4): 868-874. |
[5] | 管翠萍,杨亚珺,石 晶*. 枸杞Lb_PPR1的克隆及其在不同育性品种中的表达分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(8): 1521-1529. |
[6] | 闫思远, 杜 娟, 杨富龙, 任苗苗, 李嘉泓, 顾沛雯. PEG介导枸杞内生真菌NQ8GⅡ4遗传转化及转化子评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(12): 2385-2396. |
[7] | 吕前前, 赵兴刚, 王东东, 冒 霞, 左存武, 杨江山, . 解淀粉芽孢杆菌BaA-007鉴定及其对苹果腐烂病的抑制作用[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(10): 1895-1904. |
[8] | 殷 洁,袁 玲*. 寡雄腐霉菌剂对辣椒疫病的防治及促生效应[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(12): 2327-2337. |
[9] | 石玉莹1,宋海慧1,苗 爽1,宫 超2,王 慧2,黄海锋2,陈秀玲1,张淑梅3,*,王傲雪1,2,*. 番茄灰霉病和叶霉病拮抗细菌WXCDD51的筛选鉴定及其生防促生作用[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(10): 1925-1936. |
[10] | 孙平平,贾晓辉,崔建潮,佟 伟,王文辉*. 梨灰霉病拮抗放线菌L-30的筛选、鉴定及作用机制研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(12): 2335-2346. |
[11] | 戴国礼1,曹有龙1,*,雷志荣2,焦恩宁1,秦垦1,周旋1. 耐热枸杞新品种‘宁农杞9号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 42(S2): 2975-2976. |
[12] | 南雄雄,王锦秀,刘思洋,王娅丽,王立英,黄占明,赵 健,李 健. 叶用枸杞新品种‘宁杞9号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 42(4): 811-812. |
[13] | 杨天顺1,董静洲1,岳建林2,王瑛1,*. 枸杞新品种‘中科绿川1号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 42(12): 2557-2558. |
[14] | 纪兆林1,贺惠文1,周慧娟2,韩 峰1,童蕴慧1,叶正文2,徐敬友1,*. 地衣芽孢杆菌W10及其抗菌蛋白对桃褐腐病的抑制作用[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 42(10): 1879-1888. |
[15] | 柯红娇, 王勇, 卫甜, 谷春, 刘红霞, 郭坚华. 成团泛菌 Ljb-2 对番茄黄化曲叶病毒病的田间防效初步研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(5): 985-993. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 2012 《园艺学报》编辑部 京ICP备10030308号-2 国际联网备案号 11010802023439
编辑部地址: 北京市海淀区中关村南大街12号中国农业科学院蔬菜花卉研究所 邮编: 100081
电话: 010-82109523 E-Mail: yuanyixuebao@126.com
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司